Posted on 08/13/2015 5:08:06 AM PDT by SJackson
Nonetheless, the president told 'The New Yorker' that the Iranian government's behavior was not as extreme as its rhetoric suggests. In his latest attempt to sell the public on the merits of the Iran nuclear agreement, US President Barack Obama told an American news magazine earlier this week that he was not naive about the threats against Israel made by Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the Islamic Republic's supreme leader.
“His ideology is steeped with anti-Semitism, and if he could, without catastrophic costs, inflict great harm on Israel, I’m confident that he would,” Obama told journalist Robin Wright of The New Yorker.
Nonetheless, the president said that the Iranian government's behavior was not as extreme as its rhetoric suggests.
“It is possible for leaders or regimes to be cruel, bigoted, twisted in their world views and still make rational calculations with respect to their limits and their self-preservation," Obama told The New Yorker. "And what we’ve seen, at least since 1979, is Iran making constant, calculated decisions that allow it to preserve the regime, to expand their influence where they can, to be opportunistic, to create what they view as hedges against potential Israeli attack, in the form of Hezbollah and other proxies in the region.”
In the interview, Obama denied that the nuclear agreement negotiated by his administration with Iran is a radical shift in US policy toward the Islamic Republic.
“This does not represent a strategic rapprochement between the United States and Iran," the president said. "This is a hardheaded, clear-eyed, calculated decision to take—to seize our best opportunity to lock down the possibility of Iran getting a nuclear weapon.”
“There is nothing in this deal that is dependent on a transformation of the character of the Iranian regime.”
When asked how Obama could stomach negotiating with a country that regularly adheres to the mantra of "Death to America," he said: “It’s not appealing to deal with countries that express hatred towards us. It wasn’t easy to negotiate arms agreements with a near military peer [like the Soviet Union] that could blow up every American city.”
“But, when it comes to arms-control agreements, or nonproliferation agreements of any magnitude, by definition you’re generally dealing with those folks. I don’t have to negotiate an arms agreement with Great Britain or with France.”
Obama said that the idea of using military force against Iran is akin to "smacking around the little guy who mouths off to you in the schoolyard."
“Part of the underlying premise of why people don’t feel we should have to put up with that stuff is we’re bigger; if we launch a military strike, we can wipe them out," the president said. "There is a little bit of that schoolyard attitude of, it’s one thing for a guy your own size to mouth off to you. But if there’s a little guy, you should just smack him around. And it’s probably bad advice in the schoolyard. It’s certainly not a good way to run a foreign policy.”
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
What better reason to fund them and defend their nuclear program. They'd be no point in giving Mexico $250 billion, but Iran, they'd make good use of it.
““His ideology is steeped with anti-Semitism, and if he could, without catastrophic costs, inflict great harm on Israel, I’m confident that he would,” Obama told journalist Robin Wright of The New Yorker.”
Hey, here’s a great idea. Let’s give this radical a nuclear device because having a bomb like that can in no way harm Israel.
Why hasn’t Obama been impeached yet? Oh wait, nevermind.
"And that is why I must ensure that Iran has the bomb and hundreds of billions of dollars."
The logic of his explanation defies all logic.
He supports the Muslim Brotherhood and wants the Iranians to wipe Israel off the map, after that, wipe America off the map.
Obama & Kerry are more naive and stupid than Neville Chamberlain...
Since Obama insists that without the Iran “arrangement”, Iran would have nukes within 6 months, he MUST identify which aspect of the “arrangement” will stop them!!!
“Obama said that the idea of using military force against Iran is akin to “smacking around the little guy who mouths off to you in the schoolyard.”
Yea little punks like Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold who,
not unlike the American indians did, sneaking in while the
armed men are not around and killing the unarmed innocent and defenseless. A coward is the worst enemy. Obama is the
worst idiot to deal with because he thinks everyone else
is as stupid as he is.
The schoolyard analogy makes some sense, but is not a complete analogy. If the little twerp could get his hands on an equalizer, he could shoot up the bully and the rest of the class. Atomic weapons are something of an equalizer—if the little guy is willing to suicide in the process.
Impeached....?? We should send the white coats to but him in a bag and cart him off to the funny farm...!
Better yet...call the federal marshals and have him "frogmarched" out of the white hut, tried for treason and hanged...!
FUBO, the shouldn’t the $150 billion in frozen assets go to the victims of terrorism and anti missile missiles for Israel? Screw Iran!
And the Sultan that Khamenei will get his chance.
If Khamenei could, he would inflict great harm on Israel, and that is why Barack Hussein Obama is giving the Iranians money and support to finish their nuclear weapons program.
They are a product of the Nazis. Just as the Nazis trained the farhud.
It is disturbing that the so-called prez thinks in such convoluted, drug-induced illogic.
who told him to say and think that...if he really believed that then why in the hell would you engage and assist them in any way? school yard stupidity
And that makes him different from Obama, HOW?
I thought the first statement was describing Obama...
So, of course they can have nukes!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
