Replies

He is in this for himself. It was a fact demonstrated by his refusal to rule out a third-party bid or his insistence that he would only support the Republican Party’s presidential nominee if he were that nominee.

Another ignoramus, or is he just a practiced liar, who does not point out the fact that more two weeks ago "Big Donors" tried to concoct a scheme among the other candidates to squeeze Trump out of the first debate.

And, then, early this week, "Big Donors" put out the word that they wanted Trump "taken out" in the first debate, his candidacy destroyed by whatever means the "Big Donors" expected.

So, why the hell should Trump pledge loyalty to a party that has tolerated such behavior from "Big Donors". Rinse and other higher ups at the RNC should have condemned these schemes to deny voters a fair look at the candidates in the strongest terms.

But, crickets. After all, these folks are "Big Donors".

That little omission alone makes this column nothing but the babbling of hypocrite, or an impressive ignoramus. And we have also heard next to nothing about these "Big Donor" schemes as Trump's refusal to take the pledge has been reported, or half-ass reported, by most every news outlet.

And this makes the way Chris Wallace asked the pledge question equally fraudulent and dishonest. Wallace failed to mention the attempts by the "Big Donors" to force Trump out of the debate.

"He is in this for himself. It was a fact demonstrated by his refusal to rule out a third-party bid or his insistence that he would only support the Republican Party’s presidential nominee if he were that nominee."

I'd be willing to bet that most FRpeers would not make that pledge. Trump main issue is illegal immigration, how in hell can someone who's main issue is immigration pledge to support a Jeb Bush or any of the other amnesty candidates? Jezz this is not rocket science.

Personally I'm at the point there I think Trump should go third party. Screw the uniparty.