Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Apologies For Hiroshima or Nagasaki
Townhall.com ^ | August 8, 2015 | John Hawkins

Posted on 08/08/2015 4:27:51 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 last
To: Alberta's Child

We have war plans to invade Canada in the Pentagon today, unless our General Staff is completely incompetent.

We were simply not in a state of war with Japan before Pearl Harbor. And yes, I know who Chennault and the Flying Tigers are.


101 posted on 08/08/2015 8:53:38 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
then surely there couldn't have been any certainty that the destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki would have different results.

Needless to say we were not looking for certainty of the results. There were other alternatives and all of them were worse.

102 posted on 08/08/2015 8:53:53 AM PDT by palmer (Net "neutrality" = Obama turning the internet into FlixNet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: palmer
Such as?

How about indiscriminate destruction of civilian populations in massive bombing campaigns?

Under the circumstances, the use of two atomic bombs was morally sound. The alternative (your alternative) is stalemate and a militarized Japan that remains a threat until they develop nuclear weapons. Then, if we are lucky, a Cold War in which we hope Japan does not ally with the Soviets.

First of all, you take a major event that played out over the course of years and present it as if history had reached a point where there were only two possible scenarios. That's a ludicrous approach that treats every human interaction (or interaction between nations) as nothing more than a coin flip.

Secondly, how could there possibly be a diplomatic or moral objection to a strong relationship between Japan and the Soviet Union at that time? The U.S. had no qualms about maintaining friendly relations with the Soviets in the 1940s -- even to the point of selling out Eastern Europe to the Soviet Union at Yalta in 1944?

103 posted on 08/08/2015 9:58:00 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("It doesn't work for me. I gotta have more cowbell!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Hawkins says it well here. As honest & straight forward as it should be said.

My father and uncle were USMC in the Pacific. The bomb is probably why I and my brothers and our cousins had a chance to be born.

I am sick of this never ending Orwellian war on the truth. The evil aggressor as the innocent victim. I back down to no one on the decision to use nukes on Japan.


104 posted on 08/09/2015 11:58:39 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s, you weren't really there....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Because of that f**king John Dewey, no doubt.


105 posted on 08/09/2015 3:07:46 PM PDT by Jacob Kell (The last good thing that the UN did was Korea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson