That's the magic of a "living document". It is whatever you want it to be.
So as I understand the article.
WI has/had a liberal chief Justice
A constitutional amendment was passed that forced the chief justice out of her job
Chief Justice then sues
Federal judge rejects the lawsuit
The result is the liberal and former chief justice is now only a justice on the WI State Supreme Court.
Did I get that right?
Lawfare.
Best way to describe it is Progressives play man to man coverage and Conservatives play Zone.
Or progressives specialize in being ‘squeaky wheels’. They push and push and push, no claim is so outlandish to be overlooked and not worked into their narrative.