Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

REPORT: Navy to Charge Officer Who Fired on Islamist During Chattanooga Terror Attack
The Gateway Pundit ^ | August 1, 2015 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 08/01/2015 12:03:27 PM PDT by abb

A report at The Navy Times in July confirmed that one of the Marines shot during the Chattanooga terrorist attack exchanged fire with the terrorist. Navy Lt. Cmdr Timothy White also shot back at the terrorist.

But rather than being celebrated as a hero, Lt. Commander White may be charged for discharging a firearm on federal property.

Allen West reported this week that Lt. Commander Timothy White

Ladies and gents, resulting from the text message I received yesterday, I can confirm that the United States Navy is bringing charges against Lt. Cmdr Timothy White for illegally discharging a firearm on federal property.

The text message asked if it would be possible for Lt.Cmdr White to reach out to me. To wit I replied, affirmative.

What kind of freaking idiots are in charge of our Armed Forces — pardon me, our “unArmed Forces”? What would they prefer that Abdulazeez had been able to kill all the Marines and Sailors at the Naval Support Reserve Center? Let me draw an interesting contrast: Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus is more concerned about lifting the ban on transgendered Sailors. Mabus has a problem in that for the first time since 2007 the US Navy will not have a Carrier Battle Group operating in the Persian Gulf. But this knucklehead has no problem with the Navy seeking to destroy the career of a Sailor, a commander of an installation, returning fire against an Islamic jihadist attack. I do not care if it was his personal weapon, he deserves a medal for facing the enemy.

Folks, this has become the Obama military that will not implement policies for our men and women in uniform to be protected — but will punish them if they do protect themselves. What ever happened to the Navy of John Paul Jones, Farragut, Halsey, and Nimitz? What has happened in our America where we believe that our men and women in uniform — especially the commanders — are just targets for these damn Islamic jihadists?


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chatanooga; chattanooga; military; tennessee; terror; usnavy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
Haven't seen this posted.
1 posted on 08/01/2015 12:03:28 PM PDT by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: abb

Outrageous.


2 posted on 08/01/2015 12:04:26 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

FUBAR


3 posted on 08/01/2015 12:05:03 PM PDT by Beave Meister (Die Hard Cubs Fan.....if it takes forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

This can’t possibly be true. Satire?


4 posted on 08/01/2015 12:06:18 PM PDT by FreedomStar3028 (Somebody has to step forward and do what is right because it is right, otherwise no one will follow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Hasan and Bergdahl agree.


5 posted on 08/01/2015 12:09:32 PM PDT by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb
What has happened in our America...?

Democrats happened.

6 posted on 08/01/2015 12:09:39 PM PDT by ChicagahAl (Today's Democrats are much more Fascist than Communist; but Sen Joe McCarthy was still right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

This story smells like BS. Total and utter BS.


7 posted on 08/01/2015 12:10:27 PM PDT by FreedomStar3028 (Somebody has to step forward and do what is right because it is right, otherwise no one will follow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Of course they’re going to charge him, can’t have infidels defending themselves........./s


8 posted on 08/01/2015 12:11:18 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb
Obama does have a record of persecuting US military personnel for defending themselves.

He got 3x the number of our guys killed in Afghanistan than the previous president with his ROE.

9 posted on 08/01/2015 12:11:27 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb
But rather than being celebrated as a hero, Lt. Commander White may be charged for discharging a firearm on federal property.

Anyone associated with these charges and advancing them along, should be given an immediate reason to find new employment.

Maybe the Mosque down the road is hiring.

10 posted on 08/01/2015 12:11:40 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Moving day: June 16th, 2015. LEFT >>>HOPE and CHANGE>>> RIGHT / [DOPE and STRANGE stay home].)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

http://allenbwest.com/2015/08/whats-happening-to-this-heroic-navy-officer-from-the-chattanooga-shooting-will-make-your-blood-boil/


11 posted on 08/01/2015 12:11:53 PM PDT by abb ("News reporting is too important to be left to the journalists." Walter Abbott (1950 -))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Pentagon insanity on parade. Obonzo’s “fundamentally transformed” Amerika really sucks! When attacked by Islamoterrorists, it is your duty as an American, to NOT FIGHT BACK TO DEFEND YOURSELF! Obonzo can KMA!


12 posted on 08/01/2015 12:13:00 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Stop the DemocRATS' War On Babies! Vote conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomStar3028

http://www.infowars.com/report-navy-to-charge-officer-who-fired-on-islamist-during-chattanooga-terror-attack/


13 posted on 08/01/2015 12:13:10 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: abb

Evidently Commander White is not black.


14 posted on 08/01/2015 12:13:49 PM PDT by MistrX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb
If it wasn't for him that muzzie would still be alive.
15 posted on 08/01/2015 12:15:04 PM PDT by TYVets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

When is our military going to say, “ENOUGH”?


16 posted on 08/01/2015 12:20:20 PM PDT by Da Coyote (Di)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Opening for ANY REPUBLICAN...if they have the gonads.

Don’t be surprised if Trump quickly nails it, yet again, here. While the others wait for their ‘advisers’ (most of them gay, by the way) to tell them how they should respond.


17 posted on 08/01/2015 12:21:37 PM PDT by BobL (REPUBLICANS - Fight for the WHITE VOTE...and you will win (see my 'profile' page))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

If true, another obamshitsky W-T-F moment!


18 posted on 08/01/2015 12:21:43 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

The U.S. Navy owes me a new mind. They just blew the only one I have.


19 posted on 08/01/2015 12:23:24 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Sorry folks - I’m going to back the Navy on this one.

Federal Law is crystal clear on this one.
18 U.S. Code § 930 - Possession of firearms and dangerous weapons in Federal facilities.

How many other times had this Officer violated the law *prior* to this shooting will likely be the focus of the Article 32 hearing if I were to guess....

The only exceptions are for :
(d) Subsection (a) shall not apply to—
(1) the lawful performance of official duties by an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, a State, or a political subdivision thereof, who is authorized by law to engage in or supervise the prevention, detection, investigation, or prosecution of any violation of law;
(2) the possession of a firearm or other dangerous weapon by a Federal official or a member of the Armed Forces if such possession is authorized by law; or
(3) the lawful carrying of firearms or other dangerous weapons in a Federal facility incident to hunting or other lawful purposes.

See also
http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/521056p.pdf
DoD Directive 5210.56.

At least he’s alive to stand before the Court.


20 posted on 08/01/2015 12:23:31 PM PDT by ASOC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson