It wasn’t my headline. It’s the Hill’s headline.
Secondly, data from the Labor Department was interviewed? If so, how?
How does one interview data on the subject? LOL.
The data probably didn’t do much talking, either. ROTFL.
Typical evasive insult...
She was right, so you give her the bazoingo put down.
I think you’re generally better than this.
This was a moronic title intended to create a wedge between Trump and his supporters.
The article doesn’t address the issue in the title.
Further, none of us are against all H1-Bs. We don’t like how they are being used to displace qualified U. S. Citizen workers.
Think about this for a moment.
Since the beginning of 2001, Trump companies sought to bring in 1,100 H1-B workers. We’re not even told if they did bring them in.
15.5 years / 1,100 people.
That’s 70.96 workers per year, or 5.9 workers per month.
And that’s only if he succeeded in bringing all 1,100 in.
The headline says, “SOUGHT TO...”
If you torture the data enough, it will confess to anything.