Posted on 07/31/2015 11:59:59 AM PDT by Nachum
President Barack Obama is using anti-Jewish language to sell the Iran deal.
Some critics made that claim a week ago, when Obama complained about “the money” and “the lobbyists” on the other side of the debate over the Iran nuclear deal. This week, Obama proved it.
On Thursday, Obama led a conference call with left-wing activists in which he repeatedly railed against his political opponents by using the old canard of rich Jews using their money to exert control.
Accusing critics of the deal of being “opposed to any deal with Iran”–i.e. of advocating war–Obama railed against “well-financed” lobbyists, as well as the “big check writers to political campaigns,” and “billionaires who happily finance super-PACs.” He complained about “$20 million” being spent on ads against the deal—a subtle reference to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC–whose support he had repeatedly courted when running for office).
Some of Obama’s references were thinly-veiled attacks on specific (Jewish) individuals—columnist Bill Kristol, for example, the Weekly Standard publisher and former New York Times resident conservative who served in the George H.W. Bush administration, and also helps run the Emergency Committee for Israel, which opposes the Iran deal; or billionaire Sheldon Adelson, who is a prodigious Republican benefactor, super PAC donor, and well-known hawk on Israel issues.
On the call, Obama twice accused his opponents of being the same people “responsible for us getting into the Iraq war.“ That sweeping, and largely false, characterization of the opponents of the Iran deal repeats the sensational accusations of The Israel Lobby, a widely discredited 2007 book that accused a group of pro-Israel, and largely Jewish, individuals and organizations of pushing the U.S. into war with Iraq, and seeking to drag America into a new war with Iran.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
The list, Ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
agreed..
“the money” = Joo.
“Well-Financed” = Joos.
But seriously, people, what did you expect from a Muslim? Hugs and kisses? Why is any of this even surprising?
” using the old canard of rich Jews using their money to exert control.”
” billionaire Sheldon Adelson, who is a prodigious Republican benefactor, super PAC donor, and well-known hawk on Israel issues. “
LOL....the OTHER 99 billionaire Jews voted for Obama
This is an old leftist trick. When I was around 15 years old (1969), conservatives were trying to get fedgov out of funding PBS, as they were strictly leftist. PBS screamed back: “ What about “Firing Line” ? Yeah.....ONE conservative show out of 100. Deja vu all over again : )
And yet the media refuse to admit Obama is anti-American.
Obama is well known to specifically seek out ‘rich’ Jews for donations to HIM and his ‘causes’ (and he holds his fundraisers over and over and over and over and over and over again at Jewish supporters’ homes or in their communities... from coast to coast.
Plus he enjoys tons of support and backing from the Nazi (born Jewish) Soros.
So many good, loyal American Jews cry themselves to bed every night (figuratively speaking, of course) with embarrassment and angst that there are any so-called “Jews” supporting and financing Obama.... but....yes, just look at New York, Los Angeles, and etc. Obama sucks up every dime he can get from the Jewish-Suicide-Syndrome sufferers
and now he has the ‘audacity’ to complain about some American Jewish citizens who oppose his sell-out of USA?
There’s not an honest bone in his body. Every single day, another lie, another disambiguation, another deception...
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
What's next, an admission he didn't sleep through Rev. Wright's sermons?
What part of “Death to America!” or “Death to Israel!” does the Current Regime now operating out of the White, er, “Rainbow” Hut, in the territory once known as “the United States of America”, not understand?
Or perhaps they understand all too well, and are aiding and abetting that course of events to the advantage of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
But now the Iranians are set up on collision course with the Sunni Muslims, especially the ISIS and the Muslim Brotherhood.
This cannot end well.
For anybody.
This is a stretch even for Breitbart’s Pollack - that somehow Obama gave an extended “anti-Semitic” rant without ever, you know, mentioning the word “Jew.” It’s like liberals accusing conservative politicians of “dog whistle” language in some secret code.
The few good advisers have all jumped ship now working on 2016.
Obama is now left with VJ, Baghdad Bob and his Teleprompter.
The Teleprompter has the highest IQ
Correct. Read carefully in the last paragraph above:
"a group of pro-Israel, and 'largely Jewish', individuals and organizations who push the US into war with Iraq, and seeking to drag America into a new war with Iran"
The term he uses, largely Jewish, means he is talking about NeoCons, which includes Jews such as Kristol, Wolfowitz, Perle plus others and Gentiles such as Cheney, Libby, Graham, McCain plus others. The organization he is talking about was Project for a New American Century.
So it’s those rascally Joos again—they’re always up to no good!
I do pray that our next president is an adult.
As the latest post-treaty barrage of anti-Jewish, anti-Israel invective has come bursting out of the White House, the only prominent defender of Israel has been a Republican Christian, Mike Huckabee.
Governor Huckabee was attacked by the media for his true statements, yet he stood firm.
If liberal American Jews are now angry at Obama for embracing Iran at the expense of Israel, why aren’t they equally angry at themselves for embracing Obama and the Democrats when the Republicans have proven to be stronger supporters of Israel?
At the 2016 conventions, which party is almost certain to include an item in its platform vowing to NOT locate America’s embassy in Jerusalem? And which party will feature speakers like Mike Huckabee standing up for Israel?
Could the choice be any clearer for Jewish Americans? It’s not only about supporting Israel, it’s also about keeping age-old anti-Jewish slander about rich moneylenders out of the White House where its repetition can damage American Jews if it’s allowed to continue.
“US government promoting Islam in the Czech Republic”
April 14, 2014 6:06 am By Robert Spencer
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/04/us-government-promoting-islam-in-the-czech-republic
Obama is simply being true to his goal of islamizing the world and instituting the ‘peace of islam’ that means there is no other ideology.
1206 mosque in the US alone and counting.
There’s even one in SW Sicily.
While there were several visible Jews ( mostly the ones you included) in favor of disarming Sadam, they were only a part of that mint the and greatly outnumbered by non—Jews in taking that position at that time. For obsma to cite the Jewish citizens who were part of that movement is patently anti-Semitic -—do some Americans have less or no rights to be concerned or to participate in our political discours, just because they carry Jewish names? Protecting America is a major issue that all Americans should be concerned with Especially now that Obama is providing our most strident enemy with nuclear icbm’s Obama is a vicious islamonazi seeking to weaken America and render her vulnerable in all ways possible.
In fact it is still said today that NeoCon is a code word for Jew. And if you say Neocon, someone will accuse you of being an anti Semite, or JooooooooHater.
You can believe whatever you want to believe, but Obama, Hillary, and many others know that a GOP wedded to a NeoCon foreign policy is a losing position.
the vast majority of those supporting disarming Saddam were NOT Jewish people. Some were, as you’ve correctly pointed out. But again, the vast, vast majority were NOT Jewish. Anyone who tries to particularly call out American Jewish citizens when they were (as they usually are) only a minority of a much larger political grouping... is practicing AntiSemitism, pure and simple.
And, many of the supporters of disarming Saddam withdrew from their support for the remainder of the ‘war’ — in particular, the effort to ‘civilize’ the Muslims or ‘assist them in creating a constitutional republic respecting individual liberties, etc.). Take away the most dangerous weapons from Saddam, yes (first few weeks of the engagement).... stay there for 10 years ...NO (other than what we DID NOT do, but we can since see we SHOULD have done ...leave a logical small force at perhaps two or three critically=located bases, but that’s another discussion)..........
In short, MOST of the opposition to the Iraq episode came to rise after it became apparent that our government was trying to make nice little modern parliamentary human-rights peacenicks out of the Moslems ..... something most Americans eventually determined was unlikely of success
Let’s also remember that Congress voted support for the Iraq effort. It was not done by that ‘Horrible little Evil Man’ Bush alone.
And insofar as the anti-Semitism problem goes, the vast majority of votes in Congress were NOT Jewish legislators.
It was not a “Jewish” war, it was an effort supported by the majority of Congress (at least at the start). The Congressional vote was 297 to 133 in favor. There were not, and never were, 297 Jews in Congress, nor was/is President Bush Jewish.
We we would be very foolish indeed not to learn the lessons of that engagement... lessons we cannot even come to grips with.... if we succumb to the really very cynical Jew-scapegoating from the lunatic fringe, or any other attempt to ‘blame’ one small subset of society or any secret cabals or “Illuminati” or Masons or “Papists” or such and such. A very clear majority of OUR representatives supported (at least the start of) the Iraq engagement or ‘war’.... at least insofar as removing the most dangerous weapons threats from a man that was openly threatening to attack USA and others.
In the current day, openly murderous IslamoNazi thugs in Iran are continuing to threaten to destroy USA (their “great Satan”)... and Obama/Kerry are seeing to it that the Iranian IslamoNazis get the nuclear bombs and ICBM’s to do it.
This is such a dangerously threatening, critical situation that it is, quite frankly, necessary to suspend discussing history (Iraq, one way or the other). We MUST disarm Iran before they kill us (as they CONTINUE to promise/threaten they WILL do). Take care of the problem now (it can mostly be achieved with a few days or weeks of our great USAF in action). or... Wait til Iran completes amassing its nuclear missile arsenal... and ...millions of people will probably die ... including obviously in the large American cities the Iranis intend to bomb.
Or something like that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.