Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Homer_J_Simpson

RE: Page three and the USS Guam. Here is a link to a Freeper Foxhole thread on the USS Alaska CB-1 from way back in the day.

The USS Alaska and USS Guam were kind if odd ships, about the closest ship type to them would have been the German “Pocket Battleships” Obviously bigger than the current heavy cruiser classes but not quite big enough to rate as a battle cruiser regardless what our intrepid reporter thinks.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-vetscor/1698603/posts

Regards

alfa6 ;>}


16 posted on 07/31/2015 9:00:28 AM PDT by alfa6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: alfa6

The Alaska class was officially designated “Large Cruisers,” and carried the classification CB, as opposed to CA for Heavy Cruisers and BC for Battlecruisers. Personally, I think they were a lot closer to Battlecruisers than Heavy Cruisers. There were still Battleships like Arkansas and Texas in the Navy that sported 12” guns. The armor protection was much like that of a cruiser, but the 28,000 ton displacement was closer to the 35,000 ton treaty limit than it was to the Baltimore class heavy cruiser.

In any event, it’s hard to say what the Alaskas were.

Beautiful

Obsolete

Superfluous

They all apply.


25 posted on 07/31/2015 11:47:03 AM PDT by henkster (Where'd my tagline go?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: alfa6
Freeper Foxhole

That takes me back . . .

28 posted on 07/31/2015 11:53:04 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson