Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasFreeper2009

Wouldn’t have to be visible. The preserve was deliberately targeted. The guide (and shooter) intentionally lured the animal off the preserve to kill it. When they removed the animal’s head — they attempted to destroy the collar.

That’s like coaxing somebody’s dog off their lot in order to kill it — and then trying to destroy the dog collar.


46 posted on 07/30/2015 5:39:49 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: BenLurkin

That may be true. We do not know.

Baiting lions is legal, and a fair number of lions leave reserves and are legally killed in Zimbabwe.

What appears to be illegal in this case, is that there was no quota for a lion on that particular hunting area. The dentist may or may not have known about that.

As for the collar, not all lions on the reserve are collared. If the hunter could not see the collar, what difference does that make?


49 posted on 07/30/2015 5:47:21 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
It is legal to bait lions in Zimbabwe, to shoot them with a bow and arrow from a blind, to kill them outside a national park in a private hunting area and to kill collared lions.

next argument?

50 posted on 07/30/2015 5:48:41 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (You can't spell Hillary without using the letters L, I, A, & R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson