Skip to comments.
BREAKING: Court blocks pro-life group from releasing new fetal body part videos
Life Site ^
| July 29, 2015
| John Jalsevac
Posted on 07/29/2015 7:13:18 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
doesn’t cover other groups or individuals I bet.
2
posted on
07/29/2015 7:14:42 PM PDT
by
GeronL
To: 2ndDivisionVet
We will not recover our Constitution until people start saying: “I don’t care what the courts say.”
3
posted on
07/29/2015 7:15:19 PM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(Henry Bowman where are you?)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
What would the Alinsky Left do with video evidence - that did horrible damage to an important conservative organization - if some judge told them not to release it.
4
posted on
07/29/2015 7:15:30 PM PDT
by
Steely Tom
(Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I wonder what the going price is for a Superior Court these days.
5
posted on
07/29/2015 7:15:43 PM PDT
by
Farmer Dean
(stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
That decision cost PP a lot of money to get it go their way.
6
posted on
07/29/2015 7:15:59 PM PDT
by
TYVets
To: GeronL
The people that have the videos can ship them outside the jurisdiction of the Court and they can be seen by the receiver....
7
posted on
07/29/2015 7:16:08 PM PDT
by
HarleyLady27
(Send 'slob boy of the oval office' back to Kenya ASAP, and save America...)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Just don’t release them in California.
8
posted on
07/29/2015 7:16:34 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(There's a right to gay marriagein the Constitution but there is no right of an unborn baby to life.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Ever heard of prior restraint?
It is an unconstitutional order and can and will be ignored.
They could also simply release them from a server in Nevada or Clinton’s basement and not even violate an order with no teeth outside of California.
9
posted on
07/29/2015 7:17:39 PM PDT
by
Jim from C-Town
(The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
“Go f**k yourself, Your Honor”
Come on, SOMEONE has to have the cojones to say it! ;)
To: HarleyLady27
I thought I read about a TV station or news organization that already had ALL the videos.
Does this ruling then prevent any group that already received them from posting / showing / publishing them?
11
posted on
07/29/2015 7:18:11 PM PDT
by
tbw2
To: 2ndDivisionVet
First amendment, like the US Constitution,
is TRUMPED by the whores in Black Robes.
12
posted on
07/29/2015 7:18:11 PM PDT
by
Diogenesis
("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
To: Farmer Dean
It is a Local Los Angelas court and it is illegal to order prior restraint. It is meaningless and carries no legal weight. It isn't worth the paper it is written on.
13
posted on
07/29/2015 7:19:28 PM PDT
by
Jim from C-Town
(The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
14
posted on
07/29/2015 7:20:25 PM PDT
by
shankbear
(The tree of Liberty appears to be perishing because there are few patriots willing to refresh it.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Arn’t hidden videos the staple of investigative exposés? Isn’t this the sort of thing used by “60 Minutes” and “To Catch a Predator”?
15
posted on
07/29/2015 7:20:27 PM PDT
by
Flick Lives
(One should not attend even the end of the world without a good breakfast. -- Heinlein)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
It is not “the,” it is “a” superior court, and this court, wherever it is does not have any jurisdiction over this. As usual AP never lets the truth get in the way of their agenda.
16
posted on
07/29/2015 7:21:37 PM PDT
by
Fungi
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Anti-truth, anti-freedom, anti-individual, anti-life collectives and members of the legislative, executive and judicial have hijacked the republic.
ZERO representation ALERT!
17
posted on
07/29/2015 7:22:01 PM PDT
by
PGalt
To: 2ndDivisionVet
screwum, release it anyway!
18
posted on
07/29/2015 7:23:42 PM PDT
by
bigbob
(The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
To: tbw2
From my understand if your within that Court Jurisdiction then they cannot be shown, only a Federal Judge would have the authority to make it so the films couldn't be seen in any state...but I'm not sure...seems like I remember reading about something like this....
19
posted on
07/29/2015 7:24:04 PM PDT
by
HarleyLady27
(Send 'slob boy of the oval office' back to Kenya ASAP, and save America...)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Somehow anonymous put them on internet.....
20
posted on
07/29/2015 7:24:56 PM PDT
by
Ray76
(Obama says, "Unlike my mum, Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson