Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

This new nuclear-armed US bomb may be the most dangerous weapon in America's arsenal
Business Insider ^ | July 28th, 2015 | By Jeremy Bender

Posted on 07/28/2015 3:37:04 PM PDT by Mariner

he US just introduced a new type of bomb into its already extensive arsenal, and it may just be the most alarming US weapon yet, Zachary Keck writes for The National Interest.

The new bomb is the B61-12. On its surface, the bomb does not appear to be as dangerous as other weapons in the US arsenal. Although the B61-12 is nuclear-armed, it has a yield of 50 kilotons — tiny compared to the largest nuclear bomb that the US possesses, which has a yield of 1,200 kilotons.

But as Keck notes, that difference in explosive power doesn't tell the entire story.

"What makes the B61-12 bomb the most dangerous nuclear weapon in America’s arsenal is its usability," Keck writes. "This usability derives from a combination of its accuracy and low-yield."

(Excerpt) Read more at finance.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
Seems the R&D activities have not stopped under the commie in chief.
1 posted on 07/28/2015 3:37:04 PM PDT by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mariner

He probably couldn’t EO his way to it’s elimination.


2 posted on 07/28/2015 3:41:04 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

Uh, F-35. Seems to me there are some issues with the aircraft.


3 posted on 07/28/2015 3:42:34 PM PDT by rktman (Served in the Navy to protect the rights of those that want to take some of mine away. Odd, eh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
the most dangerous weapon in America's arsenal

Will be an Constitution loving President with cajones of steel.

4 posted on 07/28/2015 3:44:54 PM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

A couple...


5 posted on 07/28/2015 3:46:59 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Yes but telling the world about it is the new standard. ..secrets are not fair you know.


6 posted on 07/28/2015 3:47:10 PM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Ted is the ticket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Guess you couldn’t dial-a-nuke on a B-83 that low.


7 posted on 07/28/2015 3:47:28 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
This new nuclear-armed US bomb may be the most dangerous weapon in Iran's arsenal !
8 posted on 07/28/2015 3:49:51 PM PDT by timestax (American Media = Domestic Enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

At least....


9 posted on 07/28/2015 3:52:48 PM PDT by rktman (Served in the Navy to protect the rights of those that want to take some of mine away. Odd, eh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Think of ‘couple’ in a more ‘galactic’ sense.

“The universe has a couple galaxies in it”

That sort of couple.


10 posted on 07/28/2015 3:55:17 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Need three for every Muslim city on the planet.


11 posted on 07/28/2015 3:56:11 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
In a scenario that apparently now includes an atomic Iran, and for a few other good reasons that should include never having to use such a weapon, I prefer having this system and further guaranteeing lethal retribution - including your dacha or your spider hole west of Mosul - in our arsenal...
12 posted on 07/28/2015 3:57:10 PM PDT by Prospero (Omnis caro fenum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

13 posted on 07/28/2015 3:57:21 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris

I always wondered what would happen if something like that detonated.

And I would prefer to wonder on the other side of the planet.


14 posted on 07/28/2015 3:59:21 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

Everything has to happen in the right sequence. To reach the full effect, that is.

Nonetheless, they used to try to protect against lightning strikes. Probably still do.


15 posted on 07/28/2015 4:02:03 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris

True but say they were simultaneously detonated on purpose. Assuming you could time that. THAT would be some impressive applied physics.


16 posted on 07/28/2015 4:05:21 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris
We used to joke about the B-61 back in the day. Looks like they upgraded it with a guidance kit for strike fighter guys who still bomb like they are fighter guys.

This article is primed off the statements of the American Federation of Scientists, a unilateral disarmament organization funded by America's enemies. I don't mean the DNC, either.

17 posted on 07/28/2015 4:07:44 PM PDT by USNBandit (Sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris

Here’s a case where only one of six switches prevented detonation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1961_Goldsboro_B-52_crash


18 posted on 07/28/2015 4:08:09 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

I recall several war game scenarios that released nuke control to lower levels of authority. All of the commanders did exactly the same thing. They fought conventionally until their situation was desperate, perhaps even fatal. They then reached for the biggest nuke that they had and used it.

I postulate that due to the cultural reluctance to use nukes that has been ingrained in our society, it makes this particular bomb very unlikely to be deployed.


19 posted on 07/28/2015 4:08:16 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
which has a yield of 1,200 kilotons

Is that more or less than 1.2 megatons? </sarcasm>

20 posted on 07/28/2015 4:12:44 PM PDT by Ol' Dan Tucker (People should not be afraid of the government. Government should be afraid of the people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson