Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CodeToad
Pretty much, give or take. It comes down to the labor needed to mine that ounce of Gold.

Right after the Nixon administration allowed U.S. gold ownership, there were discussions all over the map about gold's usefulness in modern day fiat economies. The best comment was that gold was "stored sweat", while the worst was Paul Samuelson (Nobel Memorial Prize winner in Economic Sciences) stating that gold only had value because you could trade it for U.S. dollars. Others predicted that gold would go "as high as $350 an ounce".

I fell into that last category, buying in at $40 an ounce and bailing at $350 - there was NO WAY it would go any higher. Got back in when it hit $450 and rode it to $800 and bailed out again, saying the same thing. Luckily, that one worked out.

I've stayed out of it since, but wished I had a time machine set to 2005. Ah well. :-)

84 posted on 07/27/2015 11:14:29 AM PDT by Oatka (This is America. Assimilate or evaporate. [URL=http://media.photobucket.com/user/currencyjunkie/me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: Oatka

Exactly, gold and silver cannot be created so they become a storage of labor.


92 posted on 07/27/2015 2:33:33 PM PDT by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson