The article says the windmill was supposed to provide cost savings of $300K a year. It was working for 3 years so they that would be almost $1 million but the article unfortunately doesn’t say if that amount was achieved. And why would a city buy something that has an expected life of 20 years without a warranty that covers at least half that length of time. And from a supplier closer to home so you don’t have to ship the thing to Italy for service. So many unanswered questions.
you need to contact the reporter and coach him./s