[jjsheridan5]

The fact that you use a word like "liberaltarian" speaks volumes. Let me guess, you think it is clever. As far as 3rd party goes, the only point I made was to correct your error in assuming that 3rd party candidacies lead inevitably to a "split vote" which is then won by the Democrat. The only evidence we have shows that that is not the likeliest outcome. What any of this has to do with libertarianism is beyond me.

As far as the Republican party, which you praise because it still has men like Cruz -- men like Cruz are the red-headed stepchildren in the party. You may see their presence in the Republican party as a fact that speaks well for the party. I see how they are treated by the party as being far more revealing.

[sasportas]

The fact that you are so bent on a third party, and apparently not for Repubs like Ted Cruz, or Walker, proven conservatives, speaks volumes. Like I said, liberaltarians are not conservatives, and have been against the Repubs and for third party all along. No surprise there.