You don’t have a clue who I support.
As for Trump, he’s doing a good job of firing up the conservative base and putting the Republican establishment on notice. I appreciate that. It’s absolutely necessary. It’s not business as usual anymore.
“They Are Troubled by Trump
7/10/2015, 12:32:37 AM · 8 of 53
IAMNO1 to Kaslin
“The 2016 Republican primary has the deepest bench of candidates since that year.”
I believe this round has significantly deeper candidates than in 1980, especially amongst the Pubs. Without getting into party affiliations, the 10 the author speaks of were (in alphabetical order) John Anderson, Howard Baker, Edmund Brown, George Bush, Jimmy Carter, John Connally, Phil Crane, Bob Dole, Edward Kennedy, and Ronald Reagan. I didn't feel the bench was all that deep at the time.”
And he came back with this:
“They Are Troubled by Trump
7/10/2015, 1:12:46 AM · 14 of 53
nickcarraway to IAMNO1
It was deeper in 1980: they had one really good candidate. 2016: so far all the candidates are poor.”
Besides not knowing the definition of what a “bench” is (duh, it's not a single candidate that I was referring to), which I find very strange, almost as if that is a foreign concept to him, how on earth can anyone think that every single candidate of 15 or 16 Republican candidates in the race now is “poor”? Every one? If this fella isn't a plant whose purpose is to spread malcontent, then I don't know what a plant is.