Yes. Diversity means gathering a bunch of people who hold almost identical Marxist ideologies but who have different skin tones and sexual perversions. Kind of a Rainbow Marxism.
Failure to be appropriately ideological results in being a non-diverse person, regardless of where your skin or perversion falls on the rainbow. Failure to be in the “of color” part of the rainbow requires that your Marxism be even purer than others in order to be genuinely diverse.
By definition, conservatives, rednecks, tea partiers, and the like are non-diverse non-beings.
I should add that being diverse means having to participate in public, and rather embarrassing sacraments of diversity.
For example, men (who start with a cloud of non-diverse, counterrevolutionary suspicion about them) must earnestly pretend in public that another man cutting off his genitals doesn’t creep them out, in fact, it must be celebrated. They must also keep a straight face when gender theorists go on about penis patriarchy and whenever the vagina slogan de jour is bandied about.
It is very important that they not show that they think these ideas are stupid, silly, meaningless, or otherwise anything less than, well, holy writ.
Whites (also presumptively suspicious) must earnestly try to figure out how their dirt poor immigrant grandparents gave them a ten generation white privilege head start—in fact mentioning that you are not a Vanderbilt is in rather bad taste. If, however, you are a Vanderbilt, but have grown dreadlocks and rejected your ancestor’s values, you get some slack on the whole diversity thing—especially if you give money to your diverse betters.
Glad this thread came up -
Would be fun to offer up these what-we-really-think definitions at a work or community diversity session, and watch the facilitator ‘ s head explode!
Diversity ‘ s our strength, my arse.