This has been out a couple of days and simply being discussed at present. The problem I see....if you do the gun angle....I don’t see how you don’t take the second step and deny the same guy the right to vote. At that point, you start to get some folks disturbed about denying voters. But the legit question to ask....since we are bulking up on ‘crazy’ people getting disability payments...where is the dividing line? If you were legit crazy....normally in the south....your relatives would come over and just remove your guns from the house, in the interest of protecting you and relatives.
I don’t see this happening because it just opens up other doors...2.5 million are suggested in the numbers of this affecting....all people on social security disability, for mental issues. Might be curious to ask of the 2.5 million....how many are registered voters?
let’s not also overlook....
1. all dangerous dictators try to disarm the sheeple as a first priority order of business, by any means they can get away with
and
2. many elderly people (subject of this latest BHO gun-grab proposal) tend to vote more conservatively, too (and so are perceived by BHO as ‘enemy’ to be neutralized in all ways possible)
so for BHO’s gang, disarming the elderly would be a double-dipping success, like sort of a political double orgasm for them
(no pictures available sorry)
They are trying to take the fast route to absolute despotism - Citizen? No rights for you!