Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sushiman
Yes, almost under his breath and in passing right after he said it was not his issue but he knew it was important to the tea party members.

He described himself as strongly pro-choice as late as 2000. So what has changed? What was behind this transformation that now makes him pro-life in 2015? Oh yeah; he is now running for president and needs the tea party members who are mostly pro-life as well.

Coincidence or playing to the base?

127 posted on 07/19/2015 5:15:39 PM PDT by Sir_Humphrey (Is it too late to save the country?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]


To: Sir_Humphrey

Q: Evangelicals want to feel secure that they’re going to have a nominee that’s solid on those social issues.
A: One thing about me, I’m a very honorable guy. I’m pro-life, but I changed my view a number of years ago. One of the primary reasons I changed [was] a friend of mine’s wife was pregnant, and he didn’t really want the baby. He was crying as he was telling me the story. He ends up having the baby and the baby is the apple of his eye. It’s the greatest thing that’s ever happened to him. And you know here’s a baby that wasn’t going to be let into life. And I heard this, and some other stories, and I am pro-life.

Q: So those stories did change you, they came around and changed you?

A: They changed me. Yeah, they changed my view as to that, absolutely.

Source: David Brody interview on CBN.com , Apr 8, 2011


128 posted on 07/19/2015 5:21:28 PM PDT by sushiman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson