Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Judging from the video I saw I’d probably vote,as a juror,to award $$$ in a civil trial.It *did* look to me as if the cops could have handled that matter differently.But in a criminal trial I,a juror,would have voted “not guilty” on any and all charges,having seen no evidence of anything resembling criminal intent.


14 posted on 07/18/2015 1:07:36 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Obamanomics:Trickle Up Poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Gay State Conservative

Criminal intent? Perhaps not. But the cops were criminally negligent. That guy posed no threat....all the cops needed to do was keep talking to try and calm him down- or just leave him be. There were 3 or 4 cops hassling a guy for something as trivial and meaningless as spitting on the sidewalk. If you can spare 3 cops and a seargent for such trivialities, that means there’s no real crime on Staten Island. Transfer them to some of the high-crime areas of brooklyn or the Bronx and let them do real police work Instead of harassing people. That was a disgrace. The seargent on scene should be fired. The situation was clearly mishandled.


16 posted on 07/18/2015 1:35:54 PM PDT by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson