Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gleeaikin

> Publically displaying, selling, or disseminating nude pictures of anyone without the photographed persons specific permission for that display, sale, or distribution should be a crime, with malicious or profit intent added as a multiplier added to penalty. Exception for baby pictures to caring relatives of normal sexual proclivities.

Who can disagree with that but all of the hoopla about this issue lately involves celebrities that took nude photos of themselves then sent them to their boyfriends who either posted them later for revenge or profit. Being a celebrity they should use a little more discretion than regular folks and refrain from taking nudies knowing that they would be worth top $ if they split up. Its like a woman who knows not to walk outside in a bad neighborhood after its dark but does it anyway. I’m just saying they should have been a little more prudent.


21 posted on 07/15/2015 5:23:06 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: jsanders2001; All

Agree, prudence is good. Unfortunately, some of these celebrities are quite young, late teens, very early twenties, often spoiled and catered to from early teens, not much prudence required by their parents/managers. Civil actions are a good way to resolve monetary issues.


23 posted on 07/15/2015 11:16:13 AM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson