Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

A poster here on Free Republic (don’t remember who or which article) said that the agreement between the Forrest family and the city of Memphis was that the land the park sits on was willed to the city as long as Forrest’s bones remained where they are. If they are removed, the land reverts to the family members. Does anyone know about this?


15 posted on 07/11/2015 7:30:42 AM PDT by Humal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Humal
I have also heard that. But alas, I don't know if it is true or not.
But then again, the black city of Memphis will argue that any agreement with white Confederate sympathizers should not be recognized. And I can guaran-damn-tee they will find some judge to agree with them. All the way to the Supreme Court.
19 posted on 07/11/2015 7:38:05 AM PDT by Tupelo (I feel more like Phillip Nolan every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Humal

If true it will be ignored, Memphis accepted a large sum of money to name the city operated hospital the “John Gaston Hospital”, time goes by they changed the name kept the money. Vanderbilt received money for buildings to be named for General Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson and others but eventually changed the names and kept the money.


36 posted on 07/11/2015 8:19:53 AM PDT by duffee (Dump the Chairman of the Mississippi Republican Party, joe nosef.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Humal
A poster here on Free Republic (don’t remember who or which article) said that the agreement between the Forrest family and the city of Memphis was that the land the park sits on was willed to the city as long as Forrest’s bones remained where they are. If they are removed, the land reverts to the family members. Does anyone know about this?

Don't you worry about a thing. If this happened, Obama would simply issue an Executive Order. If that wasn't enough, the SCOTUS would rule that the words in the will have the opposite meaning, when taken in the context of the time.

40 posted on 07/11/2015 8:35:09 AM PDT by Lazamataz (NoNOnoNoNoNOnoNoNoNOnoNoNoNOnoNoNoNOnoNoNoNOnoNoNoNOnoNoNoNOnoNoNoNOnoNoNoNOnoNoNoNOnoNoNoNOnoNoNoNO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson