For conspiracy, there has to be prior agreement to commit an illegal act. The complaint accuses the actors of either agreement to commit murder, capital murder, or aggravated assault; or actually committing one of those crimes.
I agree that IF there was agreement to commit aggravated assault, and what actually occurred was murder, that the agreement or conspiracy still exists.
But the fact of an act doesn't establish conspiracy.
Based on your posting history, I believe that you are just playing word games, and doing that in bad faith. So, for now, I've exhausted my willingness to act in good faith toward you, so will stifle further comment to you.
“But the fact of an act doesn’t establish conspiracy.”
I have posted several times that it takes more than an ‘act’ to establish conspiracy.
“I agree that IF there was agreement to commit aggravated assault, and what actually occurred was murder, that the agreement or conspiracy still exists.”
As I posted, there are several items that the state would use to show conspiracy. Citing just one, if the state can show that the gangs gathered for a ‘show of force’ expecting violence then all that were summoned are part of the conspiracy.
“Based on your posting history, I believe that you are just playing word games, and doing that in bad faith. So, for now, I’ve exhausted my willingness to act in good faith toward you, so will stifle further comment to you. “
Seeing as how you have not directly addressed my points ....