Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasGator
-- Associating for the cause of criminal activities establishes a conspiracy. --

You assume the conclusion there. Your statement is a truism, "if they conspired, that establishes a conspiracy." Association with nothing more does not establish conspiracy.

-- If one of the associating commits a crime for the furtherance of the association, then others may also be charged even if they had not conspired to that specific crime. --

True in the abstract, but a legally sufficient accusation against the others requires more than an association with the criminal actor.

273 posted on 07/11/2015 11:14:04 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

“True in the abstract, but a legally sufficient accusation against the others requires more than an association with the criminal actor. “

If you go back and carefully read my post you will see that I said more than merely association.


274 posted on 07/11/2015 11:17:15 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies ]

To: Cboldt

“You assume the conclusion there. Your statement is a truism, “if they conspired, that establishes a conspiracy.” Association with nothing more does not establish conspiracy.”

If you go back and read my post I said more than ‘mere association’.


275 posted on 07/11/2015 11:18:35 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson