To: wagglebee
There is no way a Baylor prohibition against married sodomites having sex with each other would have held up in court.
79 posted on
07/08/2015 11:23:06 AM PDT by
TexasFreeper2009
(You can't spell Hillary without using the letters L, I, A, & R)
To: TexasFreeper2009; wagglebee
married sodomites having sex with each other would have held up in court
Sure, it would have, if it was an agreed upon principle to which students agree before enrolling as a condition of enrollment and continuation.
82 posted on
07/08/2015 11:29:53 AM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Pray for their victory or quit saying you support our troops)
To: TexasFreeper2009; xzins; Responsibility2nd; DJ MacWoW; little jeremiah; Coleus; narses; ...
There is no way a Baylor prohibition against married sodomites having sex with each other would have held up in court. Who cares? Baylor is a PRIVATE Baptist university, they don't need to condone sodomy in any form.
Regardless of what any court says, Baylor CHOSE to violate Biblical mandates.
Not that I'm surprised, religious colleges in this country have a long history of embracing secularism: Harvard was founded by Puritans, nearly all of the other Ivy League schools were once religious, all of the large Catholic and Protestant colleges have abandoned the faith).
84 posted on
07/08/2015 11:32:15 AM PDT by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: TexasFreeper2009
There is no way a Baylor prohibition against married sodomites having sex with each other would have held up in court. I don't know why. But for a moment let's say you're right. If so, it's time to tell the court to go to hell.
91 posted on
07/08/2015 1:07:01 PM PDT by
EternalVigilance
(Polling: The dark art of .turning a liberal agenda into political reality.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson