>>>>>So, since Slick Willie and Chairman Maobama were both elected twice, we can say that “Americans” are moral degenerates who “can be counted upon to consistently vote Democrat in election after election.”<<<<
No, but given that the majority of Catholics voted for Obama in 2008 then by the measure of your own statement the majority of US Catholics are moral degenerates. I only called them hypocrites but if you insist I’ll go with ‘moral degenerates’ from now on.
http://www.pewforum.org/2008/11/05/how-the-faithful-voted/
“No, but given that the majority of Catholics voted for Obama in 2008 then by the measure of your own statement the majority of US Catholics are moral degenerates.”
Glib, but totally irrational.
Using reason correctly is a learned skill.
“http://www.pewforum.org/2008/11/05/how-the-faithful-voted/";
Firstly, I do not trust Pew.
Secondly, a majority of white Catholics voted the right way in the three elections reported in your table.
The others, we can safely presume, are being flim-flammed by their demonrat overseers.
After reviewing the action, I’m not inclined to let you get away with your first offense against reason, either.
In response to your brutal rape of logic when you said, “the majority of Catholics are hypocrites who supposedly oppose abortion and gay marriage yet they can be counted upon to consistently vote Democrat in election after election.” I replied, “So, since Slick Willie and Chairman Maobama were both elected twice, we can say that “Americans” are moral degenerates who “can be counted upon to consistently vote Democrat in election after election.”
Limbaugh calls this “using absurdity to illustrate absurdity.” The clear implication of my statement is that it would be imminently irrational to say that “Americans are moral degenerates” on the grounds that moral degenerates have been elected to the presidency four times in the last six elections.
After all, we know at most how half the population voted. The figure is smaller than that once we account for voter fraud. Of these, let’s say half voted for the degenerate. Half of a half is…anybody? Bueller?
That’s right, fewer than 25% of votes were cast for the degenerate. How many fewer than 25%? We don’t know, but the number is not zero. And did all of them know they were voting for a moral degenerate? Almost certainly not.
The absolute worst we can say, then, is that some figure less than 25% of Americans are either moral degenerates or allowed themselves to be flim-flammed, intimidated, or bribed into voting for a moral degenerate.
It follows, therefore, that it would be not merely inaccurate, but malicious, to say that “Americans” are moral degenerates who “can be counted upon to consistently vote Democrat in election after election.”
That forces us to conclude that your statement regarding Catholics, that “the majority of Catholics are hypocrites who supposedly oppose abortion and gay marriage yet they can be counted upon to consistently vote Democrat in election after election,” must be evaluated by the same criteria.
Well, almost the same criteria. The data you produced showed that the majority of white Catholics voted for the good guy—or at least the guy who wasn’t a moral degenerate. That means that significantly fewer than 25% of white Catholics voted for moral degenerates.
When we look at non-white Catholics, we find ourselves looking primarily at border crashers, their children, and their grandchildren. We also find ourselves scratching our heads as Chicano Catholics try to square Catholicism with pressure from gangs, from professional Mexicans like La Raza, and from the general criminality in the slums. (And please don’t slur the memory of European Jews by calling them ghettos. The are not ghettos; they are slums.)
Given the extremely low educational level among this segment of the population, we must conclude that many demonrat-voting Catholics are simply disinformed.
The most important factor in this, and the one that is universally overlooked, is that a Catholic can only vote for a politician who supports ritual infant sacrifice and the practice of sodomy once.
That’s right: once.
At the instant that he pulls the lever for a moral degenerate (and yes, anyone who supports abortion and sodomy is a moral degenerate), he is excommunicated, latae sententiae, and may no longer truthfully call himself a Catholic. The number of Catholics who vote for degenerates is, therefore, vanishingly small.
It might appear that there are grounds to hold the Catholic Church responsible for allowing so many people to become so deluded as to excommunicate themselves. However, it is not the Church herself that is to blame, but rather men and women, priests and nuns, who have abused their positions of responsibility to mislead the faithful—or, at least, those who wish to be counted among the faithful.
This, in turn, is the result of Satan’s greater power throughout the 20th century, quite often exercised through the Soviet Union and its slave nations.
All things examined, your statement that “present company excepted, the majority of Catholics are hypocrites who supposedly oppose abortion and gay marriage yet they can be counted upon to consistently vote Democrat in election after election,” is not merely not merely inaccurate, but malicious.
Some people might raise the objection that it couldn’t be malicious if you actually thought you were telling the truth. To that I reply that you had a moral duty to inform yourself before you started slinging detraction around in public.