Was it Reagan who said to vote for the most conservative candidate who has a chance of winning?
Jebster has no chance of winning.
He is the designated loser like McCain and Romney.
That was before Reagan’s party reforms were systematically dismantled and the party went back to being crony elitists. Lesser of two evils only works for Leftist. When we vote lesser of two evils we undermine the foundation of conservatism.
I am not the creator of the petition by the way.
“Was it Reagan who said to vote for the most conservative candidate who has a chance of winning?”
Voted for Bush I: RAISED MY TAXES AND LOST
Voted for Dole: LOST
Voted for Bush II: RAN DEFICITS TO MOON WITH COMPASSIONATE CONSERVATISM, NEVER FOUGHT BACK
Voted for McCain: EPIC LOST
Voted for Romney: EPIC LOST
Are you maybe seeing a trend here? Even a smidgeon?
A vote for Bush III is wasted, he will lose to Hillary running without the base.
If Bush is jammed down our throats, it is third party time.
That was before the Republican party started nominating full blown socialist like Bush or Krispy Kreme.
Been down this road and I’m done with this line of thinking. If the GOPE force Bush as the nominee when they get their asses kicked up one side and down the other in November 16 this is all on them because I will be voting third party or down the ticket, but HELL NO to anymore liberal Republican nominees!!!
And it was Buckley who made a similar statement.
There’s no place for reason in these “if I can’t get everything I want, I’ll hold my breath and pound my head on the floor” threads.