Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/05/2015 6:44:50 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

2 posted on 07/05/2015 6:45:58 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Post homophobic Christianity would in fact be post Christian perversion.


9 posted on 07/05/2015 6:52:26 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Conservatism: Now home to liars too. And we'll support them. Yea... GOPe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Now when did Christianity or Christians ever fear homosexuals or homosexuality? The rejection of that is not about fear.
14 posted on 07/05/2015 6:56:05 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Christianity looks to the new dawn of Christophobic Hedonism.


16 posted on 07/05/2015 6:58:40 PM PDT by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Will anti-gay Christians be politically and socially ostracized?

They say that as though being shunned by degenerates was a bad thing ;')

18 posted on 07/05/2015 6:59:43 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The Bible and it’s teachings have not changed! It is only man that continues to try to change things.


19 posted on 07/05/2015 7:02:00 PM PDT by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Once upon a time, marriage constituted property—the wife was the literal property of the husband, and could not legally let alone culturally own anything of her own. The governing cultural norm was that women should be barefoot, pregnant and subservient.

I keep reading this. Does anyone know if this actually true?
20 posted on 07/05/2015 7:02:01 PM PDT by ronnietherocket3 (Mary is understood by the heart, not study of scripture.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The author’s a whiner. If you have anything in the way of faith, resist. Don’t accept this garbage. Don’t attend gay “weddings”. Don’t let your children be coerced at school or anywhere else.

Support your churches or synagogues unless they support this nightmare - find another that doesn’t support gay anything.

Support businesses under attack.

Write those idiots we elected and tell them that this is obscene and unacceptable. Flood their mailboxes and computers.

Show your faith and some courage: the last time they used lions to kill us - we can stand up to this stuff in our sleep.


21 posted on 07/05/2015 7:03:47 PM PDT by Chainmail (A simple rule of life: if you can be blamed, you're responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The gates of Hell will not prevail against the Church.That’s God’s promise. He may have to destroy the USA, however.


22 posted on 07/05/2015 7:05:12 PM PDT by txrefugee (In)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Tolerance should require a two-way street. Intolerance of people who due to faith and worship are constrained by faith from believing or holding a view that homosexuality and marriage are compatible, are impossible for those who follow God in both the Old and New Testament.

Are the homosexuals just intolerant themselves? Or do homosexuals renounce Christians because they know they are not acceptable to God and that God's Word forbids homosexual conduct, period. Attack the Christian but not the God? Attack Jesus by attacking Christians, but Muhammad forbid they attack Islam...

The homosexuals attack Christians on the basis of twisted view of Jesus's teachings. The best a Christian can do for homosexuals is to PRAY their sin does not lead to both spiritual and physical death.

Why do the homosexuals not attack the Word of God? Why do they focus on Jesus? Is it because there is no way to twist the Bible of the Old Testament but attacking the followers of Jesus is easier, and for Christians taking on faith Jesus is the Son of God and then became God Himself somehow destroys the Old Testament simply because of sacrifice?

The homosexuals can only attack Christians but not the Bible, period. Christians should understand this and untwist their arguments and accept the original Word of God, before Christ/Jesus and understand that they too. Rejecting in part the Old Testament in arguments for Christ is how homosexuals are able to attack Christians and the words of Jesus, but they never attempt to reject the Word of God.

24 posted on 07/05/2015 7:12:09 PM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

“Now that gay marriage (or just any old marriage if you prefer) is a “constitutionally assured right” in the United States...”
___
Five old robed farts declaring that gay marriage is okay doesn’t by any stretch make it constitutional.


26 posted on 07/05/2015 7:15:29 PM PDT by lakecumberlandvet (APPEASEMENT NEVER WORKS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
the law has to be followed.

Not when it violates the laws of nature and nature's God or the Constitution it doesn't.

That such laws are NULL AND VOID is a fundamental principle of western civilization going back through Hamilton, and Blackstone, and Locke, and Aquinas, all the way to Cicero.

And court opinions don't rise to the level of laws anyway. They're just court opinions, rendered in a particular case. That's all. Nothing more.

27 posted on 07/05/2015 7:16:47 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (I understand the temptation to defeatism, but that doesn't mean I approve of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin; GeronL; MeshugeMikey
As for everyone else, including florists and county clerks, yes, you will now have to provide the same services to straight couples that you provide to gay couples. Don’t like it? Find a new job.

Insist that one of the men wear a dress with a veil. The standard photo posings for wedding photographers don't work with "2 dudes".

Think of 10 standard shots in every wedding package:

The kiss

The extended family (their own families often choose not to attend)

The cake cutting

The garter

The couple together with the groom's arms around the bride and he stands behind her...

etc.

MANY of the posings are focused exclusively on the bride. What do you do with both members of the couple are wearing suits?

And there are wedding photographers who advertise that they SPECIALIZE in same sex wedding ceremonies. How can they "opt out" of traditional marriages like that?

Now that SSM is here (by judicial decree), I've seen some DJs and other service providers offering their services to the first (2 or 3) same sex couples that request their services at a wedding. Doesn't that discriminate against everyone else? Can you charge a different price for "specialized" weddings? Can you turn down a nudist ceremony? A satanic ceremony?

I heard a rabbi on the air say that it is like working at McDonald's. Serving them does not imply support for what they are doing. Does that mean that the rabbi should also be performing same sex ceremonies since he's just saying the words he is paid to say? Can I get a halal restaurant to serve me a pulled pork sandwich? It's just a sandwich, no implication of support...

28 posted on 07/05/2015 7:18:21 PM PDT by a fool in paradise ("Psychopathia Sexualis, I'm in love with a horse that comes from Dallas" - Lenny Bruce (1958))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

“...but I admit yet again that I didn’t foresee how wide the litigants would push the door in the other direction if they prevailed in proving that it was.”

What a dolt. I was saying to my friends in the 90s when ACTUP was everywhere in the Bay Area that this is where it would all lead.....Of course even the homosexuals denied that this is what would happen. I made em put money on it. Louses still haven’t paid up


36 posted on 07/05/2015 7:27:10 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Those Christians will be surprised when they hear “I never new you.”


38 posted on 07/05/2015 7:29:59 PM PDT by AmericanCheeseFood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

This would be a great place to post the graphic of Theodon saying, “And so it begins.” (although it began in reality years ago).

On FB, I’ve seen a HUGE step back by people of faith posting anything that the left could use against them as “homophobic”. The fascists will next seek to stop anyone from saying that homosexual marriage is wrong, ala Canada.


39 posted on 07/05/2015 7:30:45 PM PDT by Reddy (B.O. stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

So will the Almighty One change His ‘homophobic mind and laws’ regarding homosexual conduct and the perversion of His design of marriage? Better reconsider your victory laps you godless leftists for your ‘win’ is an inch deep and a mile wide. Rebellion to Gods laws gets you a one way ticket down unless repentance occurs.


44 posted on 07/05/2015 7:33:23 PM PDT by tflabo (Truth or tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Religious liberty is a right actually identify din the text of the Constitution. Reproductive rights and same-sex marriage rights are not. That, however, does not matter, it seems.


64 posted on 07/05/2015 7:59:31 PM PDT by RobbyS (quotes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
I don’t regret my long held position that the government shouldn’t be involved in marriage, but I admit yet again that I didn’t foresee how wide the litigants would push the door in the other direction if they prevailed in proving that it was.

And this is what I absolutely cannot stand about these F***ing moderates. They Never see this stuff coming, but it is OBVIOUS to everyone else who was f***ing paying attention.

It's the law of unintended consequences coming to call once more and to "surprise" all the morons that didn't see it coming.

68 posted on 07/05/2015 8:06:55 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
witness the Catholic Church’s withdrawal from the adoption business in states where adoption agencies must place children with same-sex couples. But it’s one thing to be forced out of Massachusetts; now the Church must reconsider its adoption services throughout the U.S.

Half truth.

Catholic adoption agencies were threatened with having gov. funding cut off if they refused to adopt to queers. Dependent on taxpayer funds, they folded.

Various state Baptist adoption agencies are doing fine because they have never accepted government (taxpayer) funds.............and they do not adopt to queer "families".

71 posted on 07/05/2015 8:18:17 PM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson