Skip to comments.
Marching boldly into the New Post-homophobic Christianity
Hot Air.com ^
| July 5, 2015
| JAZZ SHAW
Posted on 07/05/2015 6:44:50 PM PDT by Kaslin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
1
posted on
07/05/2015 6:44:50 PM PDT
by
Kaslin
To: Kaslin
2
posted on
07/05/2015 6:45:58 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: BenLurkin
3
posted on
07/05/2015 6:47:55 PM PDT
by
SaveFerris
(Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
To: SaveFerris
4
posted on
07/05/2015 6:49:13 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: BenLurkin
The name matches the author. Is it not correct? If not, I’ll ask for the post to be removed.
5
posted on
07/05/2015 6:50:13 PM PDT
by
SaveFerris
(Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
To: BenLurkin
6
posted on
07/05/2015 6:50:35 PM PDT
by
lightman
(O Lord, save Thy people and bless Thine inheritance, giving to Thy Church vict'ry o'er Her enemies.)
To: SaveFerris
I don’t know, man. You lost me.
But It’s all good, I think.
7
posted on
07/05/2015 6:51:08 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: lightman
8
posted on
07/05/2015 6:51:38 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: Kaslin
Post homophobic Christianity would in fact be post Christian perversion.
9
posted on
07/05/2015 6:52:26 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Conservatism: Now home to liars too. And we'll support them. Yea... GOPe)
To: SaveFerris
The freedom of religion is supposed to trump what the SC decided last week on homo marriages... in the respect that ministers do not have to marry homos if it’s against their religion. Let’s see if that is the rule after they get done with describing last week’s ruling.
To: BenLurkin
Yeah, he’s just quoting the DB and we know what DB is. I’ll have it pulled.
11
posted on
07/05/2015 6:53:21 PM PDT
by
SaveFerris
(Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
To: frnewsjunkie
And 2 of the 5 SC were appointed by 44 (IIRC).
Fundamentally-transforming the USA.
12
posted on
07/05/2015 6:54:48 PM PDT
by
SaveFerris
(Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
To: BenLurkin
Politics seems to be the death of Democracy and anything that has any religious background. Democracy is now what the Courts decide, not what the people decide.
We are lost if this continues as it seems that any religious symbols are to be destroyed even though the Constitution makes it clear that no law against Religion is clear..
The Supreme’s continue to make their own laws regardless of what the Constitution says. They are becoming another Legislative branch instead of determining Constitutionality.
That means of course that we have become something much different than our forefathers expected. We have about another 30 years or so before be become just another fascist country.
13
posted on
07/05/2015 6:55:34 PM PDT
by
Deagle
To: Kaslin
Now when did Christianity or Christians ever fear homosexuals or homosexuality? The rejection of that is not about fear.
14
posted on
07/05/2015 6:56:05 PM PDT
by
Olog-hai
To: BenLurkin
God doesn’t send people to hell. They choose to go there.
15
posted on
07/05/2015 6:57:30 PM PDT
by
Catmom
(We're all gonna get the punishment only some of us deserve.)
To: Kaslin
Christianity looks to the new dawn of Christophobic Hedonism.
To: SaveFerris
Meaning the 5 of the 9, just in case nobody gets it.
Waiting on a self-appointed genius to tell me there are 9 on the SC.
Yeah, I know.
17
posted on
07/05/2015 6:58:59 PM PDT
by
SaveFerris
(Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
To: Kaslin
Will anti-gay Christians be politically and socially ostracized? They say that as though being shunned by degenerates was a bad thing ;')
18
posted on
07/05/2015 6:59:43 PM PDT
by
rockrr
(Everything is different now...)
To: Kaslin
The Bible and it’s teachings have not changed! It is only man that continues to try to change things.
19
posted on
07/05/2015 7:02:00 PM PDT
by
Deagle
To: Kaslin
Once upon a time, marriage constituted propertythe wife was the literal property of the husband, and could not legally let alone culturally own anything of her own. The governing cultural norm was that women should be barefoot, pregnant and subservient.
I keep reading this. Does anyone know if this actually true?
20
posted on
07/05/2015 7:02:01 PM PDT
by
ronnietherocket3
(Mary is understood by the heart, not study of scripture.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson