To: All
Well since there is no such thing as “isil” they won’t be needing many...
2 posted on
07/03/2015 8:45:14 PM PDT by
rockrr
(Everything is different now...)
To: sukhoi-30mki
The answer, from the article, is only 54 planes.
3 posted on
07/03/2015 8:47:12 PM PDT by
iowamark
(I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy)
To: sukhoi-30mki
R'ht yer are myte. Reddy:
4 posted on
07/03/2015 9:03:56 PM PDT by
SkyDancer
( "Nobody Said I Was Perfect But Yet Here I Am")
To: sukhoi-30mki
I notice 91 Tucanos in the inventory. Weren’t these developed specifically for low-intensity warfare such as with ISIS?
7 posted on
07/03/2015 9:35:03 PM PDT by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
To: sukhoi-30mki
I would think 5 or 6 heavy bombers would be just fine to destroy ISIS. Forget this precision strike nonsense. Blow them to hell with cheap plentiful cluster bombs.
To: sukhoi-30mki
What a poorly written article, why not just say the Brit's military is a shadow of its former self? But they will do our bidding because they will eventually need our assistance in the Falklands because Argentina is agitating down there again.
ISIL? They are just doing our dirty work in Syria, we occasionally punish them when they step out of bounds. All of our allies in the region have been assisting them including Israel with our blessing. We could easily wipe them out any time we want, and will do so when they are no longer are of use to us, or at least that's the plan.
10 posted on
07/03/2015 10:06:08 PM PDT by
jimwatx
To: sukhoi-30mki
13 posted on
07/04/2015 12:51:05 AM PDT by
2ndDivisionVet
(You can help: https://donate.tedcruz.org/c/FBTX0095/)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
