Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Grimmy
...so that POTUS would have an excuse to trade those same 5 gitmo detainees to the jihadiscum that he eventually traded for Bergdahl.

Not quite.

Recall that the jihadis traded for Bergdahl were Taliban -- which was not involved in the attack on the Benghazi consulate.

However, a group named for Sheikh Abdul Rahman ("The Blind Sheikh") was. Further, the then-recently elected Egyptian president -- Mohamed Morsi -- was known to be close to the Libyan rebels...and seemed to get along well with President Barack Hussein Obama.

Accordingly, it has been speculated that the attack was a pre-arranged deal between Morsi and Obama designed to kidnap the ambassador and use him as a chip to trade for The Blind Sheikh.

Which would also explain why it was necessary for Obama and Hillary to come up with a cover story on short notice...no matter how preposterous.

69 posted on 07/04/2015 12:13:21 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstrea)m Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: okie01

Sharpened the razor, thanks.


72 posted on 07/04/2015 2:41:20 PM PDT by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson