It’s a double edged sword
I don’t want to see CA or NY or MA ignoring Heller...
The difference is, you have a choice of fifty states in which to reside. When the Supreme Court makes up constitutional law out of whole cloth, it effects all of us.
“It’s a double edged sword
I don’t want to see CA or NY or MA ignoring Heller...”
Don’t worry they will ether way, I for one agree they have a right and duty to as well. Heller was an edict imposing a Federal Constitutional limitation upon State Governments which hold no such limitation. It was just as lawless as the more resent edicts.
If the people of those state’s wanted the right to keep and bare arms they should have put that right into their State Constitution rather than giving their state government the authority to abridge that right.
It is not in general for Washington to protect a people from themselves only the individual’s right to vote their feet which the people of those states nonetheless oversize by the Thousands every year in fleeing their state for more economic and individual liberty offered elsewhere.