Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: iowamark
It can't be. That would mean Obama mis-spent the stimulus funds. AND continued to mispend the extra trillion dollars from stimulus that was rolled in to the spending baseline.

By the way... 6 years running and the federal building in Honolulu is still not done.

11 posted on 07/02/2015 2:09:23 AM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Organic Panic

Yep. All those “shovel ready” jobs. Where did it go? It was all a ruse by the democrats so that they could have themselves a giant slush fund. A trillion in spending, down the toilet.


16 posted on 07/02/2015 4:00:08 AM PDT by Flavious_Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Organic Panic

Kudos to you. You are the only other poster I’ve seen articulate the truth about Obama’s slush fund. The 38% increase in the baseline budget baked in the first few months of his administration and enabled by continuing resolutions.

When other members suggest we cut off funds for this or that I groan to myself. Unallocated funds can’t be cut off after budgets are reconciled because bills to do so will be vetoed. The only time to change the profligate spending is during the budget reconciliation process and that leads to a possible shutdown that leadership will not consider.

Clawing back this slush fund is about as likely to happen as me bedding Catherine Zeta-jones. They all know and they’re all complicit and worst of all there is no outrage, even here.


21 posted on 07/02/2015 5:05:40 AM PDT by VTenigma (The Democratic party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson