He seems to be leaning more to the side of it not being global warming. I'm betting the author of the article framed a question to get that last remark in.
The one guy, Schwartz the shark biologist, says global warming is irrelevant, while the other guy, Burgess (no credentials mentioned) uses “plausible” to mean “impossible to disprove completely.”
I had a friend in high school who was bitten on her foot by a shark in Virginia Beach, around 1984. When my husband says, “Oh, it’s just a sand tiger ...,” I say, “Get out of the water, kids. Losing a foot would be a nuisance.”