Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Moonman62

“Ridiculous title. The F-35 was never meant to be a dog fighter.”

Ohhh, I understand now. That must be why it carries a gun with an air to air engagement targeting system.


53 posted on 07/01/2015 12:19:21 PM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: DesertRhino

Here you go, wiseguy:

In the aftermath of the F-22’s cancellation, the Air Force was forced to alter its plans and press-gang the F-35—originally meant as a ground-attack aircraft—into service as an air-to-air fighter. It was the only way for the flying branch to keep enough dogfighters in the air.

“Operationally, we have to have it,” says Air Force chief of staff Gen. Mark Welsh. “The decision to truncate the F-22 buy has left us in a position where even to provide air superiority [we need the F-35], which was not the original intent of the F-35 development.”

To be clear, the F-35 has always had some air-to-air capability. But that latent dogfighting ability was mostly meant for self-defense—not for aggressively challenging another country’s fighters in the air.

https://medium.com/war-is-boring/can-the-f-35-win-a-dogfight-95462ccd6745


56 posted on 07/01/2015 1:30:04 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson