Posted on 07/01/2015 5:40:03 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross
HEHE....perfect.
And no, we’re “not in Kansas anymore” - and I don’t think we’ll ever be there again.
http://repository.law.umich.edu/articles/88/
Polygamy and Same-Sex Marriage
David L. Chambers, University of Michigan Law School
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1997
Abstract
In the American federal system, state governments bear the responsibility for enacting the laws that define the persons who are permitted to marry. The federal government, throughout our history, has accepted these definitions and built upon them, fixing legal consequences for those who validly marry under state law. Only twice in American history has Congress intervened to reject the determinations that states might make about who can marry. The first occasion was in the late nineteenth century when Congress enacted a series of statutes aimed at the Mormon Church, prohibiting polygamy in the Western territories and punishing the Church and those within it who entered into polygamous marriages. The more recent occasion was just last year. In the summer of 1996, Congress adopted the Defense of Marriage Act, which provides that, regardless of state laws, all acts of Congress referring to married persons shall be read as applying only to persons married to a person of the opposite sex.
Recommended Citation
Chambers, David L. “Polygamy and Same-Sex Marriage.” Hofstra L. Rev. 26, no. 1 (1997): 53-83.
Don’t forget that the Second Amendment is on the hit list too.
The left has declared “war to the knife, and the knife to the hilt”. They are playing the “Deguello”
Also reminds me of The Fisherman and His Wife/ Grimms Fairy Tales. First the wife wants a little cottage, then a mansion, then she wants to be Pope (!), THEN she wants to make the sun rise and set — and she ends up back in their little hovel.
The rather twisted stop-action show Robot Chicken, part of “Adult Swim”, had a bizarre take on ‘If you give a mouse a cookie’. About 1 minute.
I will call this NSFW. Those guys are strange.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZN4DYytjyw
It makes no sense for him to say this. It directly contradicts all the facts in his column. Denial much, Jonah?
I have had to boot so many SJWs off my social media in the last week due to the daily constant parade of this foolishness.
That was my thought exactly. How could he come to that conclusion?
too soon for that...
polygamy then the age of consent.
need the numbers of perversions to increase in order to guarantee votes for pedophilia.
The commies in the American Psychiatric Associations will have de-list pedophillia as a mental illness, too.
I am sure we will see that within 4-5 years.
The Little Red Hen comes to mind too.
Not only do they want it all; they want it for free.
To bury, entomb???
Regards,
Perhaps Jonah should have read his own article. These people are never, ever satisfied. And, the SCOTUS has shown that it is part of the cultural revolution, and cares not a bit about the Constitution or words and their actual meaning.
Group marriages will happen. Once marriage has been redefined, and it has, it will be allowed to be redefined again and again. If one special interest group gets to redefine it, you cannot prevent another group from redefining it to fit their agenda.
Magical thinking. “Even though the most ‘extreme’ speculations from four years ago have now come to pass, it will stop here.” Because ... you know, just because.
But they will not give up. They will not stop trying until the American public is forced to watch and applaud homosexual exhibitions.
The sad thing is that many Americans are perfectly fine with that prospect. Or so they say. Hopefully, there is some sort of national gag reflex that will kick in before homosexual exhibitions totally flood the national scene.
An awful lot can be done by homosexuals because most people aren’t paying any attention to anything but what is shown in national broadcast media: commercials with smiling couples and happy children, rainbow flags, a few flouncing drag queens just for color ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.