Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coolidge Was America’s Most Successful Conservative President
Human Events ^ | Monday Jun 29, 2015 9:57 AM | Garland S. Tucker III

Posted on 06/30/2015 10:09:12 AM PDT by newgeezer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Aetius

Who knows who he chose...

Don’t sell O’Connor short...she helped Bush in Bush v Gore


21 posted on 07/01/2015 6:33:13 AM PDT by TNMOUTH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

interesting. Thanks for the info. That is a knock against Coolidge then.

Still though, Reagan cannot be given a pass for Kennedy. Yes, Reagan was weakened after 1986, but he was warned about Kennedy and went ahead anyway.

And the O’Connor selection was a true waste. With control of the Senate, he could have gotten two Scalia-like judges confirmed before the Kennedy mistake. Why did Reagan make a campaign promise - to put the first woman on the Sup Court - that would only appeal to people who would never vote for him anyway?


22 posted on 07/05/2015 4:38:08 PM PDT by Aetius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TNMOUTH

With GOP control of the Senate, Reagan could have gotten two Scalia-quality judges confirmed. He could have made his diversity pick later.

O’Connor is what happens when a Republican makes a puzzling campaign promise to make a diversity-based Sup Court pick. Why did he do that? Why make a promise seemingly designed to appeal to people (leftists) who were never going to vote for him?

Like Kennedy, O’Connor got some things right. But she was also part of the majority that saved Roe and that sanctioned the use of racial preferences. She also developed an insufferably smug attitude about judges and criticism of them.

And while it was correct to stop the Florida Sup Court from trying to allow Gore to streal the election, in hindsight perhaps a Gore win wouldn’t have been so bad...if he had been a one-term President. All else being equal, there wouldn’t have been any Sup Court vacancies until after 2004, and maybe a more competent Republican than Bush would have defeated Gore in 2004, and maybe that competency could have avoided the disastrous final part of Bush’s presidency that helped elect Obama. That may be too much to wonder about I know. The media would have tried to blame any Republican for Katrina, and the economic collapse had been set in motion years earlier by the diversity-worshiping zeal of both parties to increase minority home ownership, credit standards be damned.


23 posted on 07/05/2015 4:54:50 PM PDT by Aetius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Aetius; Impy; Clintonfatigued; sickoflibs; BillyBoy

I never understood why Reagan was so adamant about explicitly appointing O’Connor (I believe he expressed in his own diary such feelings about doing so, despite being counseled that it was a bad choice). Surely there was another female Conservative sitting on the bench (or in another elective office) that could’ve done far better.

Reagan sometimes made some really odd choices that ultimately backfired (for one, he should never have chosen Bush as his running mate when he should’ve chosen Paul Laxalt. He had similarly harmed himself in 1976 when he picked liberal PA Sen. Dick Schweiker to be his running mate, which may have been enough to narrowly cost him the nomination over Ford).

Had Jus. Lewis Powell retired a year earlier, we might’ve gotten a better pick. As you’ll remember, the Democrats got the Senate back in 1987. That allowed them to do their number on Robert Bork (had Bork gotten the votes of all the Republicans, he still would’ve lost — had it been a year earlier, he might’ve gotten on the court — though the downside is that he’d have died while Zero was in office allowing his replacement).

Douglas Ginsburg would’ve done well on the court and might’ve gotten through (might), but the marijuana thing did him in (oddly it didn’t come out a year earlier when he was confirmed to the DC Court of Appeals). After 2 trials with those, Reagan was probably weary and went with a “safe” Ford judicial appointee. Ultimately, he might’ve had a difficult time with getting another Scalia or Rehnquist on the court, and after their ‘86 victory, the Dems were hell-bent on stopping another Conservative judicial appointment. I still remember how ugly it was with elevating Rehnquist, where the media/Dems accused him or implied he physically blocked Black people from voting in Arizona, a scurrilous lie.


24 posted on 07/05/2015 5:18:00 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Bush was a bad choice for VP, but certainly not an odd one.

Schweiker, that was odd. Damn odd.

As was his *ardon for O’Connor, I suppose.


25 posted on 07/05/2015 8:39:17 PM PDT by Impy (They pull a knife, you pull a gun. That's the CHICAGO WAY, and that's how you beat the rats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson