[Cboldt]

Nope. Similar case is underway in the 9th Circuit now, but on the basis of its previous denial of an injunction, the circuit courts appear ready to uphold "must be locked, in the house" legislation.

On June 8, this year, SCOTUS denied cert. to hear ESPANOLA JACKSON, ET AL. v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, ET AL.

Thomas penned a dissent to the denial of cert, I suppose as an effort to persuade the 9th Circuit to change course.

[Navy Patriot]

...the circuit courts appear ready to uphold "must be locked, in the house" legislation.

Affirmative, I suggest everyone train up on what to say to the jackboots, ... nothing without your lawyer, then the lawyer says that the firearm was properly secured and locked before being unlocked and retrieved by the home defender at the appearance of threat, and never left the control of the home defender afterward.

[Clump]

Scalia joined Thomas.
My hope is that the others in the Heller majority are just waiting for it to be ripe.
It really is a no brainer.