Posted on 06/29/2015 9:36:27 AM PDT by NetAddicted
In my partner’s third grade class there is the child of lesbian grandparents. “Mom” abandoned him. Dad of course was nowhere to be found, if even known.
The kid is so messed up, when he is in the classroom, virtually everything shuts down except trying to control for his behavior.
Thankfully, he usually runs away. The school does not stop him.
Yikes! The significance of this *cannot* be overstated.However,an all-out assault on this organization will be conducted by the Pervert Mafia and,just as your local bakery in Little Italy does,they *will*,eventually,buckle under the pressure.
They also put out this:
Risks of the homosexual lifestyle
http://factsaboutyouth.com/posts/health-risks-of-the-homosexual-lifestyle/
It does not hold back any punches about what the risks are if you click on the links especially: Physical Health- Male Homosexual Behavior. Female Homosexual Behavior
But last week’s SCOTUS decision has absolutely no impact on whether or not gay parents have children. Gay parents having their own children and adopting children was going on for years before SSM was allowed. All last week’s SCOTUS decision did was give more stability to the families of children with gay parents by allowing their parents to marry.
I must disagree. When an “official” stamp is put on a social practice, institutionalizing it, many who would have hesitated before will now rush in. Yesterday’s gay parents knew they were fighting a battle for which they would be the poster children and role models. Today’s gay parents are now “entitled.” Starting now, will gay parenting practices and standards rise or fall? Human nature dictates the latter.
The shame is that God will judge a nation because of it’s evil rulers. Read the story of Pharaoh and Egypt. The stupid people of this country put him into office -not once, but twice.
Doesn’t matter. Far more important to a) attack Christian values and b) try to make sinners feel like they’re not sinning.
Tough luck, kids.
“last week’s SCOTUS decision has absolutely no impact on whether or not gay parents have children”
That’s not true. Before the ruling, marital status could be a factor for many things. For example, a “single-family” residence can technically speaking limit entering into landlord tenant relationships where the tenants either are a single adult (with or without children) or a married heterosexual couple (with or without children). It could be the basis to exclude unmarried couples (whether hetero- or homo-sexual).
Bottom line: forcing states to recognize “same-sex marriage” will result in more children being adopted by or given in custody to homosexuals.
“All last week’s SCOTUS decision did was give more stability to the families of children with gay parents by allowing their parents to marry”
If you want to argue in favor for “homosexual marriage”, you are on the wrong forum. Waiting to join until well into Obama’s second term makes your comments very suspect anyway.
Making custodial rights of homosexuals over children more permanent is not the same thing as making their homes more stable any more than making a law that would prevent judges from considering a parent being an alcoholic when deciding which parent should be awarded custody in a divorce.
Exposing kids to homosexual behavior is abuse. The ruling institutionalizes this into law permanently (or at least as much as this nation is “permanent”).
wow
Great response! I had just read ConstantSkeptic’s post, was bothered by it, and was going to go back to it to try to respond. You far exceeded what I might have come up with. Congratulations!
Will they have a spokesman on CNN, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, or CBS, discussing the ruling? Cows will fly first.
Bookmark and bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.