Posted on 06/29/2015 8:33:15 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Instead of having Scalia resign, how about we try the six for treason?
Guinsberg? She’s the little shitfaced one, right?
And Mr. Justice Scalia is absolutely correct in both cases.
Is the author a sodomite socialist?
Tar.
Feathers.
Fencerail.
Use only as directed ...
BYOR.
Or at least impeach them.
Wonder where our brave House members are?
RE: I don’t know what the “obloquy of the putsch” means
Obloquy: strong public criticism or verbal abuse
Putsch: a violent attempt to overthrow a government.
I think that ship has sailed. Or never launched.
Just another liberal banging his spoon on his highchair because somebody didn't agree with him.
As much as I disagree with Scalia in some of his decents, I tend to like him and his view points. He has done nothing wrong to the point of having to resign.
Because he has too much dignity to continue to ride aboard the clown car for any more absurd majority decisions.
Quitting and writing a tell-all book about what really goes on in there would be much more helpful to the nation.
Absolutely not. He is much, much more valuable (and certainly more needed) on the Supreme Court than as AG.
Because you don't defend the Constitution by destroying it. Trying them for treason would be unconstitutional. The Constitution defines treason very narrowly:
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.
As Justice Scalia reminded this week (sadly, in dissent), words have meaning. And the Constitutional definition of treason is plainly not intended to include instances in which the Supreme Court issues an incorrect (even woefully incorrect and dangerous) judicial opinion.
Ginsburg does a lot of napping. As for Sotomayor and Kagan, they're probably on the line with the White House a lot to see how they should vote.
No, keep him on the SCOTUS.
Not much left to be told. There’s Bob Woodward’s book, ‘The Brethern’, Michael Toobin’s book, ‘The Nine’ and many others.
http://www.streetlaw.org/en/Page/39/Books_About_the_Supreme_Court
What’s lacking isn’t knowledge. What’s lacking is the will to restrain them.
Don't be shocked when those two freaks get themselves a nice, legal sodomite ceremony ... I think Kagan is the 'groom' ...
I think Kagan is the ‘groom’ ...
Yes, perhaps so...yes, definitely...definitely a ‘groom on a broom...’
One can’t help but notice that even Ginsberg refuses
to resign during this administrations tenure.
The hidden premise of your post is that we have a legitimate, constitutional government.
We don't. We have an illegitimate, unconstitutional regime that has dissolved much of our Constitution, rendered it null, and imposes its illegal will by force, making war against the people and the ;ate government of the United States.
That is treason.
sitetest
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.