Skip to comments.
Supreme Court rules against EPA on pollution rules
Washington Examiner ^
| 6-29-2015
| John Siciliano
Posted on 06/29/2015 7:44:32 AM PDT by sheikdetailfeather
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
YES!!!!
To: sheikdetailfeather
It will be ignored.
So, no victory.
2
posted on
06/29/2015 7:45:36 AM PDT
by
unixfox
(Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
To: sheikdetailfeather
Why were the power companies required to comply while the court case was going on?
3
posted on
06/29/2015 7:47:16 AM PDT
by
joshua c
(Please dont feed the liberals)
To: sheikdetailfeather
One small victory...but not to be ignored!
4
posted on
06/29/2015 7:47:47 AM PDT
by
MeshugeMikey
("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
To: sheikdetailfeather
We are just one (or 2) justices away from leftist destruction. The next president will make this go one way or the other for many years.
5
posted on
06/29/2015 7:48:40 AM PDT
by
umgud
(When under attack, victims want 2 things; God & a gun)
The ruling only states that costs must be a consideration. If the EPA consideration order is all grey-area and not strictly defined it will be twisted to mean “Ya, we looked at it and considered it and we consider it moot”
6
posted on
06/29/2015 7:49:09 AM PDT
by
USCG SimTech
(Honored to serve since '71)
To: unixfox
It’s a good thing that our Republican heroes in Congress have starved the EPA of money and voted to close it down in order to halt its abuses.
What? Oh. Never mind.
7
posted on
06/29/2015 7:50:17 AM PDT
by
Pelham
(Deo Vindice)
To: sheikdetailfeather
FINALLY!
Someone in government who’s not afraid of the liars at the EPA
To: sheikdetailfeather
One out of three is still a failing grade.
9
posted on
06/29/2015 7:51:32 AM PDT
by
exit82
("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
To: USCG SimTech
or, yes we considered cost, and we know it will put you out of business, tough luck, COMPLY!
To: sheikdetailfeather
Obama will take care of this little “problem” with his pen and his phone.
11
posted on
06/29/2015 7:52:56 AM PDT
by
WayneS
(Yeah, it's probably sarcasm...)
To: exit82
2 steps forward, one step back is a win for the left.
12
posted on
06/29/2015 7:53:21 AM PDT
by
prisoner6
(Unmutual and Disharmonious)
To: exit82
13
posted on
06/29/2015 7:53:42 AM PDT
by
WayneS
(Yeah, it's probably sarcasm...)
To: joshua c
Why were the power companies required to comply while the court case was going on?Because it's comrade Obama, and what he says, goes.
14
posted on
06/29/2015 7:55:39 AM PDT
by
wastedyears
(Iron Maiden - The Book of Souls, out Sept 4th, 2015)
To: sheikdetailfeather
15
posted on
06/29/2015 7:56:01 AM PDT
by
1010RD
(First, Do No Harm)
To: HoosierWordsmith
The regulators will change the place of 1 comma and claim its a new regulation and do what they wish.
The Fed.GOV has become untethered from the Constitution. The final blow was the 2 cases in last week that the former Article III court called “supreme” decided to usurp the powers of the the Congress (Article I) and Congress (Article V) and the States (Article V) by creating legislative language not in law, and creating a constitutional power not given in the Constitution.
16
posted on
06/29/2015 7:59:24 AM PDT
by
Bidimus1
To: BuckeyeTexan
To: Lurking Libertarian
Just remember. The only reason we won this is because Kennedy wasn’t PMS.
18
posted on
06/29/2015 8:04:15 AM PDT
by
EQAndyBuzz
(Change the Defense of Marriage Act to the Defense of Holy Matrimony Act. Game, set match.)
To: sheikdetailfeather; Lurking Libertarian; Perdogg; JDW11235; Clairity; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; ..
FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.
19
posted on
06/29/2015 8:04:29 AM PDT
by
BuckeyeTexan
(There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
To: sheikdetailfeather
Doesn't matter.
Unlike us, Obola has a constitutional right to ignore SCOTUS rulings he doesn't like.
20
posted on
06/29/2015 8:04:37 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
("One man with a gun can control a hundred without one." -- Vladimir Lenin)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson