Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Zakeet

There are problems with this:

He was NEVER a law professor.

He’s lazy, ignorant, and easily bored, and 99% of USSC cases are boring corporate law.

He can’t write (because he’s stupid), and his professors all thought he was stupid, ignorant, and lazy.

He committed perjury on his Illinois Bar questionnaire. He said he had never used any name other than “Barack Hussein Obama.”

He seems to have surrendered his law license.

OTOH: There is no legal requirement that a member of the Court be a lawyer at all, and lots of them have been stupid and lazy.


5 posted on 06/29/2015 3:08:14 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Arthur McGowan

If FDR’s poker buddy can end up on the Supreme Court,...


22 posted on 06/29/2015 4:13:37 AM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Arthur McGowan

He’d no doubt vote ‘present’ on every case except those in favor of approving some unholy lifestyle or so-called ‘civil’ right.

He’d be the first SCOTUS community organizer.


31 posted on 06/29/2015 4:44:53 AM PDT by Pilgrim's Progress (http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson