Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Aetius

>>”It was obvious all those things would increase the number of refugees, and it was obvious that the West would be suckers and take in those refugees.”<<

Yes. Perhaps, the West should have stayed out of that part of the world entirely in the last 60 yrs or so; though it’s too late now, and the West obviously won’t stay out.

So, if the West does continue to wage wars, then the West equally is *morally*, at least, obliged to take in the refugees that result. History is often a continuation; we also are and have been paying for the consequences of our own actions in those parts of the world for the last 60 yrs, if not more.


60 posted on 07/03/2015 4:59:46 AM PDT by odds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: odds

I don’t agree that intervention makes us morally obligated to accept refuges. But if it does, then all the more reason to avoid war in third world countries.


61 posted on 07/05/2015 4:29:55 PM PDT by Aetius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson