Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pollster1
"The opposition is voters (real or fictional) who identify as colored, identify as black, identify as Hispanic, identify as gay/lesbian/bisexual/transgender/transspecies/transfat/whatever. We do need to focus on the base, but we cannot afford to make that a racial identification."

That sounds great in theory, but the facts are something different. According to Ann's book, which I'm currently reading:

Minnesota has gone from 99% European to 20% African (Somali) immigrant. As a result, crime has greatly increased, welfare more than doubled, and mosques are being built all over the place.

Since we started admitting floods of Third World immigrants, our prison populations have sextupled.

In New York State prisons, foreign inmates were 70% more likely to be incarcerated for violent crimes than American inmates. The top ten countries of the immigrant inmates were:

Dominican Republic, Jamaica, Mexico, Guyana, El Salvador, Cuba, Trinidad and Tobago, Haiti, Ecuador, and Colombia. These countries were represented by the hundreds and thousands, in some cases.

In contrast, there were 49 from England, and a few other European countries represented in the single digits. There was 1 Dane.

Coulter writes exhaustively about the hugely disproportionate amount of crimes committed by Hispanics compared to whites, Hispanics have the highest unwed birth rates in the country, even higher than that of blacks. Hispanics who are American citizens vote 8-2 for Democrats because they want the social programs.

26 posted on 06/29/2015 8:10:01 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon ( ((("This is a Laztatorship. You don't like it, get a day's rations and get out of this office."))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: CatherineofAragon

We are discussing unrelated issues. I agree that illegals should all be deported. I strongly oppose any form of Amnesty that rewards criminals. I support the opposite - fingerprint, retina-scan, and DNA swab all illegals and permanently bar them from any legal reentry and any legal path to citizenship. Change the interpretation of the anchor baby clause. An illegal is not subject to the jurisdiction of our government, as their governments always point out, so their babies are not citizens just because they were born while illegally present on our territory.


29 posted on 06/29/2015 8:57:29 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson