Posted on 06/28/2015 5:48:20 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(CNSNews.com) -- The American University Museum in Washington, D.C. will host an art exhibition this fall that protests the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) current ban on blood donations from men who have had sex with other men (MSM).
The museum says the exhibit, entitled “Blood Mirror", will feature a “powerful sculpture created from the blood of 9 gay men."
Viewers of the sculpture will be able to see themselves reflected on the surface of the encased blood.
Gay artist Jordan Eagles said in a press release that he preserved the blood within a seven-foot-tall monolith to show “that this blood could have been used to save lives.”
The American University Museum told CNSNews.com that Eagles was not paid for the sculpture, and that government monies are not funding the upcoming exhibit.
Volunteer blood donors for the sculpture include an 88-year-old gay priest, a transgender male couple, an Army captain discharged from service under “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” an identical gay twin, a bisexual father, and three gay rights activists.
“Each man is currently ineligible to donate blood under the FDA's current policy -- but since they cannot donate their blood to save lives, they've chosen to donate their blood for art,” the press release states.
"This discriminatory policy is part of our gay history and part of our nation's history, and the sculpture asks us to reflect on discrimination in our country, as well as the homophobia that exists around the world,” Eagles continued.
The exhibit will also include a short film by Leo Herrera, who said the sculpture “represents homophobia so deep that it infected science itself and spawned a fear of our most precious fluids.”
The FDA’s policy banning blood donations from sexually active gay men was established at the beginning of the AIDS epidemic in 1983 “and is not based on any judgment concerning the donor's sexual orientation,” the FDA states.
Rather, men who have had sex with men are prevented from donating blood because of their increased risk of HIV, Hepatitis B, and other infections which can be transmitted through blood transfusion, the agency explains.
“Current scientific data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) indicate that, as a group, men who have sex with other men are at a higher risk for transmitting infectious diseases or HIV than are individuals in other risk categories.”
On May 13, the FDA proposed a new policy that would allow men who have abstained from sex with other men for 12 months to donate blood.
“In 2010, male-to-male sexual contact accounted for 63% of newly diagnosed HIV infections among adults, and 78% of newly diagnosed HIV infections in men, indicating that male-to-male sexual contact remains associated with high risk of HIV exposure,” the FDA noted.
The agency added that “sufficient data are not available to assess the effectiveness of selecting MSM with low HIV risk based on deferral times of less than one year since last exposure…
“Additionally, the available epidemiologic data in the published literature do not support the concept that MSM who report mutual monogamy with a partner or who report routine use of safe sex practices are at low risk for HIV.”
However, since no such celibacy restrictions exist for heterosexual donors, Eagles and Herrera called it an “equally flawed proposed revision.”
According to the press release, issued during the public comment period for the new FDA proposal, “the sculpture will inspire dialogue about the FDA’s discriminatory policy.”
“The FDA is taking a bold step. There’s been a discriminatory policy in place and a change is, in fact, happening. It’s historic, but it doesn’t do enough, and it’s not actually fair. How many gay men do I know that are actually going to be celibate for 12 months? Gay men that I know that are married, that are monogamous with each other?” said Eagles in Herrera’s film.
“What actually seemed like something that was a step in the right direction -- [I] sat with it for a while and actually felt like this was even worse. Here we are in 2015 and we have all this medicine and science at our disposal, and this is the best that they could do?”
Eagles said his work “will never be finished until the FDA’s blood donation policy is fair for all people.”
It’s all about your “rights”, don’t you know.
Does he have a biologics license?
I’v been asked recently if I needed blood, would I accept it. WTH would I say? Of course no one will turn it down. It’s just like that one shell in the pistol. Take your chances!
That’s why there should be no blood from gays, period!
Then we wouldn’t have to make a choice.
This could be considered “disparate impact” since few heterosexuals have sex in public bathrooms.
Why do they have sex in public bathrooms anyway? Can’t they go to a gay bar and pick someone up or would that take the romantic ambience away?
I’ve posted this before, but the STD numbers from the CDC when it comes to gay and bi men are truly frightening. Men who have sex with other men account for no less than 78% of new HIV infections each year. That’s an astounding number. Even moreso when you consider that the CDC claims MSM are 7% of the population, which is a much higher number than what Gallup or most other reliable polls would indicate.
The CDC *also* reports that MSM represent very similar numbers of new syphilis infections each year. Syphilis is still a killer in its own right.
It’s got NOTHING to do with bigotry or homophobia, or whatever other catchphrase these folks want to use. It’s just sound science not to take blood from such a high-risk group. If it were needle-sharing drug users we were talking about, no one would even think of lifting the ban.
BTW, one also needs to examine the circumstances under which a proposed lifting of the ban. The most common version is, MSM can donate if they honestly state they’ve not had a MSM encounter in the previous 12 months. Okay, seriously? How many people, straight or gay, in a physical relationship, are going to go chaste for a year simply to donate a pint of blood? I’m betting not many. What I would bet on is a lot of false claims of having refrained from MSM contact. In other words, the rule is just a political gimmick to get around a medically-sound law.
I hope the media starts reporting on all of these demands post the gay marriage decision. Don’t let us have it in drips and drabs just give it to us all at once. Pile it on. Let the liberal voting simps see what they have done to their country. Maybe some of them can be shocked to their senses. You have been used, liberals. You have been used.
There is nothing too low for them to stoop to.
You make me think of another high risk group: women who have sex with lots of men. Or even with one man who gets around. Ugh
“The data indicate that rates of HIV infection among gay men and other men who have sex with men (MSM) are more than 44 times higher than rates among heterosexual men and more than 40 times higher than women.”
Read more at http://www.bilerico.com/2010/03/us_gay_mens_astonishing_hivstd_rates.php#YEW9Yb15MzfMoKzH.99
Homosexual activists believe that if they can get HIV and AIDS thoroughly into the general population that the heto\ero population will force it to be fixed. They cannot see that as the preferred pet population of the ruling class they are already getting more dollars allocated to HIV-AIDS research than can be used profitably.
Homosexual activists believe that if they can get HIV and AIDS thoroughly into the general population that the hetero population will force it to be fixed. They cannot see that as the preferred pet population of the ruling class they are already getting more dollars allocated to HIV-AIDS research than can be used profitably.
Homosexual men tend to literally have dozens, even hundreds of sexual partners, in addition to anonymous hook-ups in public parks, internet apps, and adult movie arcades. Feces and urine are sexualized.
Oh, now we all have to use their Aids-soaked blood? That’s next?
Oh, now we all have to use their Aids-soaked blood? That’s next?
Comes to mind:
Proverbs 18:2
Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions
Titus 3:9
But avoid foolish controversies and genealogies and arguments and quarrels about the law, because these are unprofitable and useless.
I have been banned from giving blood since about 1995 because I spent time in Germany in 89-91 (in the military). The red cross cited the risk of mad cow disease.
I have O-negative blood - the universal donor type and only 8% of the population.
I was over a gallon donated at that point.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.