Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GregNH

Since the U.S. Code 3 Chapter 1 Section 19 was enacted in 1948 looking at presidential elections prior to then is probably fruitless. The previous Presidential Succession Acts (1886 and 1792) did not include the “fail to qualify” language (removal, death, resignation or inability).

1792 Act

https://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/United_States_Statutes_at_Large/Volume_1/2nd_Congress/1st_Session/Chapter_8

1886 Act

https://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/Presidential_Succession_Act_1886

BTW, technically they stop at section 18. Section 16 is just the seating chart for the joint session of Congress during the Electoral College vote count (and therefore always used), section 17 was last employed in 2004 (last time there was an object to the Electoral College vote) and section 18 just gives the President of the Senate (usually the current Vice-President) control of the joint session.


149 posted on 06/29/2015 6:54:58 PM PDT by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]


To: 4Zoltan

Thank you and I do understand all that but I also know that there was some controversy surrounding Chester Arthur and I would think that maybe there was discussion when the first NBC became CIC.


151 posted on 06/29/2015 7:07:46 PM PDT by GregNH (If you can't fight, please find a good place to hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson