Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/26/2015 4:00:53 PM PDT by Isara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: Isara
It is not just the judiciary that is lawless, indeed treasonous, the entire democrat party and the propaganda media (MSM) is just as treasonous. They intend to destroy the Constitution and with it America. Senator Cruze, I support you but your response is inadequate for the task. How about this, Congress should vote to limit the jurisdiction of the court. Cut them off at the knees. Quit pretending the court's a lawless decisions must be followed. The court is not nobility. They are not Dukes or Barons who's every dictate must be followed under penalty of death. Or are they? Perhaps they are. How about Congress eliminate he seats of activists judges. Teach them a real lesson. Or are the people going to have to teach them a lesson? We are fed up with our arrogant, dictatorial government.
56 posted on 06/26/2015 5:37:19 PM PDT by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Isara

Sic Semper Tyrannis


57 posted on 06/26/2015 5:37:49 PM PDT by SVTCobra03 (You can never have enough friends, horsepower or ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Isara

Article 3, Section 2, middle paragraph gives Congress all the power they need to overrule the Supreme Court and discard any of their opinions in this matter:

“In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.”

Those 535 folks in DC who took an oath to protect and defend the Constitution need to get on this right away.

The Supreme Court is not the final say. Congress is.


64 posted on 06/26/2015 5:54:30 PM PDT by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Isara
"And if Congress will not act, passing the constitutional amendments needed to correct this lawlessness, then the movement from the people for an Article V Convention of the States — to propose the amendments directly — will grow stronger and stronger."

This is Ted Cruz's ticket back to electability.

An advocate for an Article V Convention.

He would have even my unequivocal support.

67 posted on 06/26/2015 5:55:34 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18 - Be The Leaderless Resistance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Isara
I have a much shorter answer than Ted Cruz has.

A Court System and indeed an entire Government's lawlessness is best restrained by a heavy, concentrated, and overwhelming exercise of the Second Amendment in the Nations Capital.

Sooner or later, it's coming. There will be no middle-ground and no more sitting on the fence. The time to re-take our liberty from a runaway, lawless Supreme Court who's over-extended their Constitutional Authority and subjected 320,000,000 people to it's will is coming.

Prepare.

74 posted on 06/26/2015 6:05:22 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Isara

We have exhausted three of the four boxes traditionally used to manage our formerly free republic. The fourth box beckons.


76 posted on 06/26/2015 6:14:55 PM PDT by Noumenon (Resistance. Restoration. Retribution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Isara; All

As a side note to this thread, please consider the following question.

How did citizens react when the corrupt Court legalized abortion in 1973? Although the corrupt Court has likewise unconstitutionally legalized gay marriage imo, I suspect that citizens are much more aware of the dirty work of activist justices this time around which is a good sign if so, particularly since an election year is coming up.


78 posted on 06/26/2015 6:21:57 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Isara

“Rendering the justices directly accountable to the people would provide such a remedy. Twenty states have now adopted some form of judicial retention elections, and the experience of these states demonstrates that giving the people the regular, periodic power to pass judgment on the judgments of their judges strikes a proper balance between judicial independence and judicial accountability. It also restores respect for the rule of law to courts that have systematically imposed their personal moral values.”

I have advocated that very thing for years. However, I also advocate that all “landmark” decisions MUST be ratified by the states just as if it were a constitutional amendment. The SCOTUS has essentially taken it upon themselves to amend the COTUS whenever they feel like it. Their decisions should be ratified by the states before they have ANY force of law.


79 posted on 06/26/2015 6:25:31 PM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Isara

STATE NULLIFICATION OF UNCONSTITUTIONAL FEDERAL LAWS.

The $4 trillion feds, 80% or about $3 trillion of which is unconstitutional, are beyond fixing. Who is going to force the hundreds of thousands of government workers, bureaucratic heads, and officials who work for the unconstitutional part of the federal government to pack up their bags and go home?

The fight for OUR freedom and OUR Constitution which protects it, is SQUARELY at the STATE level against the feds.


82 posted on 06/26/2015 6:33:35 PM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Cruz: We must not submit our constitutional freedoms, and the promise of our nation, to judicial tyranny.


83 posted on 06/26/2015 6:36:34 PM PDT by Isara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Isara

What if, big if here, but just saying. What if, in the next election people are so fed up, that we actually get a super majority republican congress along with a republican president. Enough to impeach these activists judges. Maybe, if, just saying, hoping, praying....


88 posted on 06/26/2015 6:47:10 PM PDT by ForYourChildren (Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - Classical Christian Approach to Homeschool ])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Isara

Didn’t this start with the birth control decision in the 1960s?


97 posted on 06/26/2015 7:20:07 PM PDT by PghBaldy (12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Isara

Cruz does not go far enough.


101 posted on 06/26/2015 7:34:30 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Isara

Constitutional amendments are useless.

Cruz pretends to be incensed, and then plans to do absolutely nothing.

What a hypocrite.


107 posted on 06/26/2015 8:14:31 PM PDT by cmj328 (We live here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All; left that other site

may the Lord bless and protect Ted Cruz and his family.


109 posted on 06/26/2015 8:35:39 PM PDT by kingattax (a real American would rather die on his feet than live on his knees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Isara

Constitutional remedies for this lawlessness is the second amendment. Cruz should just come out and say it. Legal means will not stop the insanity.


113 posted on 06/26/2015 8:52:18 PM PDT by FreedomStar3028 (Somebody has to step forward and do what is right because it is right, otherwise no one will follow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pride in the USA; Stillwaters

Ted Cruz at his finest, proving that he has no political equal. I will crawl across broken glass to vote for this man.


116 posted on 06/26/2015 9:21:45 PM PDT by lonevoice (Life is short. Make fun of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Isara

Pfl


122 posted on 06/26/2015 9:53:49 PM PDT by Batman11 (The orange, weeping, drunk, squishy oompah-loompah and Yertle McTurd-le gotta go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Isara

Great! And, I’ll bet Cruz didn’t have to spend time to put together that critique of the SCOTUS. He has the ability to quickly formulate his thoughts and facts and then communicate them extemporaneously. ....This is a keeper, for me!


139 posted on 06/26/2015 11:16:37 PM PDT by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Isara
periodic judicial-retention elections

Huh, this country elected Clinton twice and Obama twice. What's so magical about elections?

143 posted on 06/27/2015 12:16:15 AM PDT by annalex (fear them not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson