Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: re_nortex

What’s the source for that? That doesn’t square with the Sarah Palin I know.

<><><><><>

You don’t know her, you know her media image.

Married 8/29/88

First child’s birthday 4/20/89

I suspect you can do the math on that. They eloped for a reason. She was pregnant. And you’ll need some evidence if you wish to speculate that Track was a premature birth.


129 posted on 06/27/2015 7:10:13 AM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: dmz
You don’t know her, you know her media image.

Married 8/29/88

First child’s birthday 4/20/89

I suspect you can do the math on that. They eloped for a reason. She was pregnant. And you’ll need some evidence if you wish to speculate that Track was a premature birth.

Your "math" is rather speculative, and proves absolutely nothing as far as the elopement.

The child could easily have been born a few weeks premature, so assuming the most negative explanation is not particularly compelling.

130 posted on 06/27/2015 7:15:31 AM PDT by sargon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson