Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
It was an unmitigated disaster for all sides, especially for the future of the Republic.

The Republic emerged from the rebellion stronger and more solid than ever. It's been the presidents since - Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, FDR, LBJ, Nixon, et.al. - who went and threw all that away.

19 posted on 06/26/2015 7:50:18 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg
The Republic emerged from the rebellion stronger and more solid than ever.

Strength and Power are not the measure of a successful Republic. Consent of the Governed is the measure of success for a Nation formed on such a concept.

Hitler's Europe would have been a strong Union and probably more solid than any other, but it would not have been a successful Union according to the foundational principles of this nation because it would not be ruled by the consent of the governed.

The Soviet Union was another nation that ruled against the consent of the governed, and no doubt by your assessment, it would be regarded as solid and strong.

That misses the point completely. Your argument simplifies (in the mathematical sense) to "Might makes right."

21 posted on 06/26/2015 8:00:07 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson