Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: napscoordinator

I see what you are saying. I do think it matters as a matter of precedent. I am not a big fan of the hate crime laws anyway. Isn’t all murder varying degrees of hate? Certainly it is not love. And tagging other crimes as hate just to make the punishment more severe seems wrong to me. Doesn’t all crime have a bad motive? It makes sense to take motive into account to the degree that it is premeditated. But “hate” just results in making some people more valuable than other people.


34 posted on 06/25/2015 10:11:24 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
But “hate” just results in making some people more valuable than other people. p> The existence of "hate crimes" as an incremental criminal act sets the stage for the eventual treatment of "hate" as a free-standing crime.

This allows the criminalization of language, even thought -- which is a long-term objective of the Left.

35 posted on 06/25/2015 10:31:57 PM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson