Skip to comments.
US Supreme Court Issues and Opinions - 9:30am EDT (SCOTUS Blog to start at 9am) 6-25-15
SCoTUS Blog ^
Posted on 06/25/2015 3:41:45 AM PDT by Perdogg
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 201-207 next last
To: Perdogg
Decision of the Fourth Circuit is affirmed in King v. Burwell. 6-3.
per scotusblog.com
81
posted on
06/25/2015 7:08:06 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: hondact200
Second opinion: Obamacare...4th district affirmed....Roberts decision....subsidies are available!
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Gruber, Romney, Obama and ObamaCARE have won.
83
posted on
06/25/2015 7:08:42 AM PDT
by
Diogenesis
("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
To: HoosierWordsmith
84
posted on
06/25/2015 7:08:44 AM PDT
by
hoagy62
(Only one solution left.....)
To: Perdogg
Decision means:
This means that individuals who get their health insurance through an exchange established by the federal government will be eligible for tax subsidies.
Roberts writes the opinion, per FoxNews.
Obama win.
85
posted on
06/25/2015 7:09:04 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: Diogenesis
This is just ridiculous. The statute says what it says.
86
posted on
06/25/2015 7:09:09 AM PDT
by
mrs9x
To: Genoa
Subsidies upheld, Roberts majority. (Twitter)
Shocked I am not
To: Perdogg
Frigging traitor Roberts.
88
posted on
06/25/2015 7:09:25 AM PDT
by
markomalley
(Nothing emboldens the wicked so greatly as the lack of courage on the part of the good -- Leo XIII)
To: Perdogg
SUPREMES LOVE OBAMACARE
via Drudge
To: Genoa
90
posted on
06/25/2015 7:09:45 AM PDT
by
Dog
(..."I'm just a cook...")
To: HoosierWordsmith
To: TomGuy
Sorry, just have to ask again....
COULD HARRIET MIERS POSSIBLY HAVE BEEN ANY WORSE????
To: HoosierWordsmith
To: Dog
NO MORE OPINIONS TODAY. We’ll have to wait till tomorrow & Monday for the rest.
94
posted on
06/25/2015 7:10:50 AM PDT
by
hoagy62
(Only one solution left.....)
To: HoosierWordsmith
Wow. So, disparate impact and subsidies upheld on the same day? Bad day. And a bad day for textualism (neither ruling was in line with the text of the relevant law).
To: mrs9x
‘The statute says what it says.’
Yep, there goes ‘the rule of law’.
96
posted on
06/25/2015 7:11:11 AM PDT
by
mrsmith
(Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
To: conservative98
SCOTUS and their Staff are EXEMPT under ObamaCARE.
SHould they not have recused themselves?
97
posted on
06/25/2015 7:11:38 AM PDT
by
Diogenesis
("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
To: hoagy62
This thing wasnt even close...6-3 right.
98
posted on
06/25/2015 7:12:10 AM PDT
by
Dog
(..."I'm just a cook...")
To: Perdogg
99
posted on
06/25/2015 7:13:23 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: Buckeye McFrog
COULD HARRIET MIERS POSSIBLY HAVE BEEN ANY WORSE???? Harriet Miers was nominated for the seat that ultimately went to Alito, not to Roberts. So, yes, she could have been worse. Alito has been (generally) good.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 201-207 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson